Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 389, 326 (25 September 1997) | doi:10.1038/38594
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Research Fellows
- Northwestern University
- Chicago, Illinois, United States
Paleobiologist / Biogeochemist
- University of Cincinnati
- Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
Gillian Breen1
- Medical Research Council, 20 Park Crescent, London W1N 4AL, UK
I and my colleagues read with interest the Commentary by Christine Wennerås and Agnes Wold about nepotism and sexism in peer-review in the Swedish Medical Research Council (Nature 387, 341–343; 1997).We keep under constant review the fairness of our peer-review procedures and seek to ensure that our boards, committees and panels are constituted to reflect the clinical, non-clinical, gender, age, ethnic origin and geographical spread of the biomedical community in the United Kingdom.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
