Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Deep winds on Jupiter as measured by the Galileo probe

Abstract

The Doppler Wind Experiment on the Galileo probe provided the first in situ data on wind speeds in Jupiter's atmosphere. Initial analysis1 of the results indicated that wind speeds increase with depth, rather than decaying to zero below the cloud tops or remaining relatively constant as had previously been assumed2. But this earlier analysis was subject to several potential sources of error, as highlighted by the fact that wind speeds measured at the cloud tops did not seem to match those inferred from tracking clouds3 in images obtained by the Voyager spacecraft. Here we report new analyses of the probe data that use a corrected treatment of the timing errors, adopt the measured4 (rather than predicted) descent trajectory, and incorporate a new calibration of the instrumentation that takes into account the unexpectedly high temperatures encountered by the probe. We determine wind speeds at the cloud tops (700-mbar level) in the range 80–100 m s−1, in agreement with the results of cloud tracking; the speed increases dramatically between 1 and 4 bar, and then remains nearly constant at 170 m s−1down to the 21-bar level. The increase in wind speed implies a latitudinal density gradient of 0.5% per degree in the 1–2 bar altitude range, but whether these winds are driven by internal heat or absorbed sunlight remains uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The Doppler wind measurements (main figure) now incorporate a number of significant changes from the preliminary results of Atkinson et al.1 (inset).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson, D. H., Pollack, J. B. & Seiff, A. Galileo Doppler measurements of the deep zonal winds at Jupiter. Science 272, 842–843 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pollack, J. B., Atkinson, D. H., Seiff, A. & Anderson, J. D. Retrieval of a wind profile from the Galileo probe telemetry signal. Space Sci. Rev. 60, 143–178 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Limaye, S. S. Jupiter: new estimates of the mean zonal flow at the cloud level. Icarus 65, 335–352 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seiff, A. et al. Structure of the atmosphere of Jupiter: Galileo probe measurements. Science 272, 844–845 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingersoll, A. P. et al. Interaction of eddies and mean zonal flow on Jupiter as inferred from Voyager 1 and 2 images. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 8733–8743 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orton, G. et al. Earth-based observations of the Galileo probe entry site. Science 272, 839–840 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beebe, R. F., Simon, A. A. & Huber, L. F. Comparison of Galileo probe and Earth-based translation rates of Jupiter's equatorial clouds. Science 272, 841 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seiff, A. et al. Wind speeds measured in the deep jovian atmosphere by the Galileo probe accelerometers. Nature 388, 650–652 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Folkner, W. M. et al. Earth-based radio tracking of the Galileo probe for Jupiter wind estimation. Science 275, 644–646 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hess, S. L. & Panofsky, H. A. in Compendium of Meteorology (ed. Malone, T. F.) 391–398 (Am. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, 1951).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingersoll, A. P. & Cuzzi, J. N. Dynamics of Jupiter's cloud bands. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 981–985 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, G. P. Jovian dynamics. Part I: vortex stability, structure, and genesis. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 2685–2734 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ingersoll, A. P. & Cuong, P. -G. Numerical model of long-lived jovian vortices. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2067–2076 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Busse, F. H. Asimple model of convection in the jovian atmosphere. Icarus 29, 255–260 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ingersoll, A. P. & Pollard, D. Motion in the interiors and atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn: scale analysis, anelastic equations, barotropic stability criterion. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 62–80 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dowling, T. E. Estimate of Jupiter's deep zonal-wind profile from Shoemaker–Levy 9 data and Arnol'd's second stability criterion. Icarus 117, 439–442 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poincaré, H. Sur la Précession des corps déformables. Bull. Astron. 27, 231–356 (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gierasch, P. J., Conrath, B. J. & Magalhaes, J. O. Zonal mean properties of Jupiter's upper troposphere from Voyager infrared observations. Icarus 67, 456–483 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sromovsky, L. A. et al. Solar and thermal radiation in Jupiter's atmosphere: initial results of the Galileo probe net flux radiometer. Science 272, 851–854 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ingersoll, A. P. & Porco, C. C. Solar heating and internal heat flow on Jupiter. Icarus 35, 27–43 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dowling, T. E. & Ingersoll, A. P. Jupiter's great red spot as a shallow water system. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 3256–3278 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kirk, R. L. & Stevenson, D. J. Hydromagnetic constraints on deep zonal flow in the giant planets. Astrophys. J. 316, 836–846 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Galileo Project and NASA's Planetary Atmospheres Program. This work was supported by NASA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Atkinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkinson, D., Ingersoll, A. & Seiff, A. Deep winds on Jupiter as measured by the Galileo probe. Nature 388, 649–650 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/41718

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/41718

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing