Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns of parasitism and predation

Abstract

Although polymorphism is a widespread phenomenon that hasbeen recognized for nearly two centuries, the basic mechanisms maintaining most polymorphisms in nature are unknown1,2. We present evidence that a polymorphism can be maintained exclusively by balanced selection from two predatory species. For fieldand laboratory experiments, we used the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, which occurs as ‘green’ and ‘red’ colour morphs, and two species that attack pea aphids, the parasitoid Aphidius ervi and the predator Coccinella septempunctata. We found that when parasitism rates in the field were high relative to predation rates, the proportion of red morphs increased relative to green morphs, whereas the converse was true when predation rates were high relative to parasitism rates. Detailed laboratory and field studies confirmed that green morphs suffer higher rates of parasitism than red morphs, whereas red morphs are more likely to be preyed on by predators than green morphs are. We present a mathematical model that demonstrates that biased density-dependent parasitism and/or predation on different morphs is sufficient to maintain the colour polymorphism in the population. Our findings support an important role for predation in the maintenance of genetic diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Change in proportion of red morphs in the aphid population between successive field samples versus the relative predation pressure.
Figure 2: Theoretical conditions leading to coexistence of green and red aphid morphs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falconer, D. S. & McKay, R. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 3rd edn (Longman, New York, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rousseau, J. J. Letters on the Elements of Botany (English translation, (1785)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Araya, J. E., Cambron, S. E. & Ratcliffe, R. H. Development and reproduction of two color forms of English grain aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Envir. Entomol. 25, 366–369 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henter, H. J. & Via, S. The potential for coevolution in a host-parasitoid system. I. Genetic variation within an aphid population in susceptibility to a parasitic wasp. Evolution 49, 427–438 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Müller, F. P. Differential alarm pheromone responses between strains of the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34, 347–348 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe, H. J. B. Resistance and susceptibility to colour forms of the aphid Sitobion avenae in spring and winter wheats (Triticum aestivum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 99, 87–98 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Price, P. W. Insect Ecology 2nd edn (Wiley-Interscience, New York, (1984)).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutierrez, A. P., Hagen, K. S. & Ellis, C. K. in Critical Issues in Biological Control (eds Mackauer, M., Ehler, L. E. & Roland, J.) 81–109 (Intercept, Andover, (1990)).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frazer, B. D., Gilbert, N., Ives, P. M. & Raworth, D. A. Predator reproduction and the overall predator-prey relationship. Can. Entomol. 113, 1015–1024 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phoofolo, M. W. & Obrycki, J. J. Comparative life-history studies of Neartic and Paleartic populations of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Envir. Entomol. 24, 581–587 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thiboldeaux, R. L., Hutchison, W. D. & Hogg, D. B. Species composition of pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) primary and secondary parasitoids in Wisconsin. Can. Entomol. 119, 1055–1057 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Markkula, M. Studies on the pea aphid, A. pisum, with special reference to the differences in the biology of the green and red forms. Ann. Agri. Fenniae 2 (suppl. 1), 1–30 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michaud, J. P. & Mackauer, M. The use of visual cues in host evaluation by aphidiid wasps. II. Comparison between Ephedrus californicus, Monoctonus paulensis, and Praon pequodorum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 74, 267–275 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Losey, J. E. & Denno, R. F. The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-foraging predators: Factors affecting dropping behavior. Ecol. Entomol. (in the press).

  15. Nakamuta, K. Visual orientation of a ladybeetle, Coccinella septempunctata L., (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), towards its prey. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 19, 82–86 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Battaglia, D., Pennacchio, F., Romano, A. & Tranfaglia, A. The role of physical cues in the regulation of host recognition and acceptance behavior of Aphidius ervi haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Insect Behav. 8, 739–750 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ives, A. R., Kareiva, K. & Perry, R. Response of a predator to variation in prey density at three hierarchical scales: lady beetles feeding on aphids. Ecology 74, 1929–1938 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Honek, A. Factors which determine the composition of field communities of adult aphidophagous Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Zeit. Angew. Entomol. 94, 157–168 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Helenius, J. Conventional and organic cropping systems at Suitia (Finland): VI. Insect populations in barley. J. Agri. Sci. Finland 62, 349–356 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewontin, R. C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change (Columbia University, New York, (1974)).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maynard Smith, J. The Theory of Evolution 3rd edn (Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, (1975)).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brakefield, P. M. in The Scientific Management of Temperate Communities for Conservation (eds Spellerberg, I. F., Goldsmith, F. B. & Morris, M. G.) 45–79 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, (1991)).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Berry, R. J. in The Scientific Management of Animal and Plant Communities for Conservation (eds Duffey, E. & Watt, A. S.) 177–206 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, (1971)).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Samways, M. J. Insect Conservation Biology (Chapman and Hall, London, (1994)).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Hogg, R. ffrench-Constant, T. Garland, M. Strand, M. Hamill, J.Foufopoulos, E. Klopfer and J. Klug for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the US Department of Agriculture to A.R.I.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Losey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Losey, J., Harmon, J., Ballantyne, F. et al. A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns of parasitism and predation. Nature 388, 269–272 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/40849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/40849

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing