Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Trade-off-invariant rules for evolutionary stable life histories

Abstract

Optimization models have been widely and successfully used in evolutionary ecology to predict the attributes of organisms1–8. Most such models maximize darwinian fitness in the face of tradeoffs and constraints; the numerical results usually depend on the exact form of the trade-offs or constraints. But not always9: for example, earlier work9 predicted that the optimal range in offspring size ought to show a – 1 scaling with small litter size, independent of most details of the underlying offspring-survival/offspring-size trade-off relation. Here I report that in non-growing (stationary), age-structured populations, three major life-history attributes (age at first breeding, size of an offspring in large litters, and reproductive effort) are likely to evolve to equilibrium values that satisfy a universal numerical rule; the underlying trade-off will have a slope of – 1 at the optimum, independent of most other aspects of the trade-off. Each of these three attributes can be viewed as an allocation problem between just two alternatives; the trade-off is then between having more of one alternative and less of the other. The slope of the trade-off is simply the slope of the curve of allowed combinations of the two alternatives. The theory predicts that natural selection will push to an equilibrium where the slope is always – 1. The economic structure is the same as that which underlies evolution of the sex ratio where the two alternatives are sons and daughters2,10.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker, G. A. & Maynard Smith, J. Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348, 27–33 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnov, E. L. The Theory of Sex Allocation (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seger, J. & Stubblefield, J. W. in Adaptation 93–123 (Academic, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bulmer, M. G. Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1994.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Godfray, H. C. J. Parasitoids (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 1994).

  6. Charnov, E. L. Life History Invariants (Oxford Univ. Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Charnov, E. L. & Downhower, J. F. A trade-off-invariant life-history rule for optimal offspring size. Nature 376, 418–419 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. MacArthur, R. H. in Theoretical and Mathematical Biology (eds Waterman, T. H. & Morowitz, H.) 388–397 (Blaisdell, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, G. C. Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100, 687–690 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charnov, E. L. Evolution of life history variation among female mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 1134–1137 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lloyd, D. G. Selection of offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies. Am. Nat. 129, 800–817 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mock, D. W. & Parker, G. A. The Evolution of Sibling Rivalry (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stearns, S. C. Tradeoffs in life history evolution. Funct. Ecol. 3, 259–268 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Charnov, E. L. & Berrigan, D. Why do female primates have such long lifespans and so few babies? Evol. Anthropol. 1, 191–194 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charnov, E. Trade-off-invariant rules for evolutionary stable life histories. Nature 387, 393–394 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/387393a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387393a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing