Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Saturday 24 June 2017
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 379, 804 - 806 (29 February 1996); doi:10.1038/379804a0

Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies

Michael H. R. Stanley*, Luís A. N. Amaral*, Sergey V. Buldyrev*, Shlomo Havlin*, Heiko Leschhorn*, Philipp Maass*, Michael A. Salinger & H. Eugene Stanley*

* Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
Minerva Center and Department of Physics, Bar-IIan University, Raman Gan, Israel
Department of Finance and Economics, School of Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

A SUCCESSFUL theory of corporate growth should include both the external and internal factors that affect the growth of a company1–18. Whereas traditional models emphasize production-related influences such as investment in physical capital and in research and development18, recent models10–20 recognize the equal importance of organizational infrastructure. Unfortunately, no exhaustive empirical account of the growth of companies exists by which these models can be tested. Here we present a broad, phenomenological picture of the dependence of growth on company size, derived from data for all publicly traded US manufacturing companies between 1975 and 1991. We find that, for firms with similar sales, the distribution of annual (logarithmic) growth rates has an exponential form; the spread in the distribution of rates decreases with increasing sales as a power law over seven orders of magnitude. A model wherein the probability of a company's growth depends on its past as well as present sales accounts for the former observation. As the latter observation applies to companies that manufacture products of all kinds, organizational structures common to all firms might well be stronger determinants of growth than production-related factors, which differ for companies producing different goods.

------------------

References

1. Gibrat, R. Les Inégalités Economiques (Sirey, Paris, 1933).
2. Coase, R. H. Economica 4, 386−405 (1937).
3. Hart, P. E. & Prais, S. J. J. R. statist. Ser. A119, 150−191 (1956).
4. Simon, H. A. & Bonini, C. P. Am. Econ. Rev. 48, 607−617 (1958). | ISI |
5. Baumol, W. Business Behavior, Value, and Growth (MacMillan, New York, 1959).
6. Hymer, S. & Pashigian, P. J. polit. Econ. 52, 556−569 (1962).
7. Cyert, R. & March, J. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963).
8. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. J. fin. Econ. 3, 305−360 (1976).
9. Ijiri, Y. & Simon, H. A. Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).
10. Lucas, R. Bell J. Econ. 9, 508−523 (1978).
11. Jovanovic, B. Econometrica 50, 649−670 (1982).
12. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Technical Change (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982).
13. Golan, A. thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley (1988).
14. Holmstrom, B. R. & Tirole, J. in Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol. 1 (eds Schmalensee, R. & Willig, R.) 61−133 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).
15. Williamson, O. E. in Handbook of industrial Organization Vol. 1 (eds Schmalensee, R. & Willig, R.) 135−182 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).
16. Milgrom, P. & Roberts, J. Economics, Organization, and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1992).
17. Radner, R. Econometrica 61, 1109−1146 (1993).
18. Golan, A. Adv. Econometrics 10, 1−46 (1994).
19. Davis, S. J. & Haltiwanger, J. Q. J. Econ. 107, 819−863 (1992).
20. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. & Schuh, S. J. Job Creation and Destruction (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996).
21. Singh, A. & Whittington, G. Rev. Econ. Studies 42, 15−26 (1975).
22. Hall, B. H. J. Indust. Econ. 35, 583−606 (1987).
23. Evans, D. S. J. Polit. Econ. 95, 657−674 (1987). | Article |
24. Shapiro, D., Bollman, R. D. & Ehrensaft, P. Am. J. Ag. Econ. 69, 477−483 (1987).
25. Dunne, T., Roberts, M. & Samuelson, L. Q. J. Econ. 104, 671−698 (1989).
26. Stanley, M. H. R. et al. Econ. Lett. 49, 453−457 (1995).
27. Friedman, M. J. Econ. Lit. 30, 2129−2132 (1992).
28. Leonard, J. Working Paper No. 1951 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 1986).
29. Risten, H. The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, Heidelberg, 1988).
30. Li, W. Phys. Rev. A43, 5240−5260 (1991).
31. Mantegna, R. N. & Stanley, H. E. Nature 376, 46−49 (1995). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1996 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy