Abstract
OBSERVATIONS are providing progressively tighter constraints on cosmological models advanced to explain the formation of large-scale structure in the Universe. These include recent determinations of the Hubble constant1á¤-3 (which quantifies the present expansion rate of the Universe) and measurements of the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background4,5. Although the limits imposed by these diverse observations have occasionally led to suggestions6 that cosmology is facing a crisis, we show here that there remains a wide range of cosmological models in good concordance with these constraints. The combined observations point to models in which the matter density of the Universe falls well below the critical energy density required to halt its expansion. But they also permit a substantial contribution to the energy density from the vacuum itself (a positive ᤘcosmological constantᤙ), sufficient to recover the critical density favoured by the simplest inflationary models. The observations do not yet rule out the possibility that we live in an ever-expanding ᤘopenᤙ Universe, but a Universe having the critical energy density and a large cosmological constant appears to be favoured.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freedman, W. L. et al. Nature 371, 757–762 (1994).
Riess, A. G., Press, W. H. & Kirshner, R. P. Astrophys. J. 438, L17–L20 (1995).
Hamuy, M. et al. Astrophys. J. 109, 1–13 (1995).
Smoot, G. F. et al. Astrophys. J. 396, L1–L5 (1992).
Steinhardt, P. J. Int. J. mod. Phys. A10, 1091–1124 (1995).
Bolte, M. & Hogan, C. J. Nature 376, 399–402 (1995).
Guth, A. H. Phys. Rev. D23, 347–356 (1981).
Linde, A. Phys. Lett. 108B, 389–392 (1982).
Albrecht, A. & Steinhardt, P. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1220–1223 (1982).
Bardeen, J., Steinhardt, P. J. & Turner, M. S. Phys. Rev. D28, 679–693 (1983).
Guth, A. H. & Pi, S.-Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110–1113 (1982).
Starobinskii, A. A. Phys. Lett. B117, 175–178 (1982).
Hawking, S. W. Phys. Lett. B115, 295–298 (1982).
Harrison, E. Phys. Rev. D1, 2726–2730 (1970).
Zel'dovich, Ya. B. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 160, 1p–3p (1972).
Peebles, P. J. E. & Yu, J. T. Astrophys. J. 162, 815–836 (1970).
Davis, R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1856–1859 (1994).
Bunn, E. F. & Sugiyama, N. Astrophys.J. 446, 49–53 (1994).
Copi, C., Schramm, D. N. & Turner, M. S. Science 267, 192–199 (1995).
Kolb, E. W. & Turner, M. S. The Early Universe Ch. 9 (Addison-Wesley, Reading,MA. 1990).
Ratra, B. & Peebles, P. J. E. Astrophys. J. 432, L5–L9 (1994).
Kamionkowski, M., Spergel, D. N. & Sugiyama, N. Astrophys. J. 426, L57–L60 (1994).
Fukugita, M., Hogan, J.C. & Peebles, P. J. E. Nature 336, 309–312 (1993).
Jimenez, R. et al. (in preparation).
Carroll, S. M., Press, W. H. & Turner, E. L. A. Rev. Astrophys. 30, 499–542 (1992).
Fukugita, M. & Turner, E. L. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 253, 99–106 (1991).
Maoz, D. & Rix, H.-W. Astrophys. J. 416, 425–443 (1993).
Peebles, P. J. E. Physical Cosmology (Princeton Univ. Press, 1994).
Strauss, M. A. & Willick, J. A. Phys. Rep. (in the press).
White, S. D. M., Navarro, J. F., Evrard, A. E. & Frenk, C. S. Nature 366, 429–433 (1993).
Peacock, J. A. & Dodds, S. J. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 267, 1020–1034 (1994).
Turner, M. S., Steigman, G. & Krauss, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2090–2093 (1984).
Peebles, P. J. E. Astrophys. J. 284, 439–444 (1984).
Kofman, L. & Starobinskii, A. A. Soviet Astr. Lett. 11, 271–274 (1985).
Efstathiou, G., Sutherland, W. J. & Maddox, S. J. Nature 348, 705–707 (1990).
Coles, P. & Ellis, R. Nature 370, 609–702 (1994).
Krauss, L. & Turner, M. S. Class. Quantum Grav. (submitted).
White, S. D. M., Efstathiou, G. & Frenck, C. S. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 262, 1023–1028 (1993).
Bond, J. R. in Cosmology and Large Scale Structure (ed. Schaeffer, R.) (Eisevier Science Publ., in the press).
Gorski, et al. Astrophys. J. 430, L89 (1994).
Gorski, K., Ratra, D., Sugiyama, N. & Banday, A. J. Astrophys. J. 444, L67–L71 (1995).
Bond, J. R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 13–16 (1994).
Jungman, G., Kamionkowski, M. & Kosowsky, A. preprint astro-ph/9507080 (1985) (Syracuse Univ., 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ostriker, J., Steinhardt, P. The observational case for a low-density Universe with a non-zero cosmological constant. Nature 377, 600–602 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377600a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377600a0
This article is cited by
-
Curvature dominance dark energy model in f(R)-gravity
Indian Journal of Physics (2023)
-
Unveiling the Universe with emerging cosmological probes
Living Reviews in Relativity (2022)
-
Dark energy-dominated Universe in Lyra geometry
Indian Journal of Physics (2022)
-
Newtonian Fractional-Dimension Gravity and MOND
Foundations of Physics (2020)
-
Linear expansion models vs. standard cosmologies: a critical and historical overview
Astrophysics and Space Science (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
