Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths

Abstract

INTERSPECIFIC mutualisms inherently possess a conflict of interests between the interacting species in that fitness increases of one species occur at the expense of the other. This holds for mutualisms as diverse as plant associations with mycorrhizal fungi or nitrogen-fixing bacteria, animals and endosymbionts, and obligate plant-pollinator associations1–6. Prevailing models of interspecific cooperation predict that mutualistic interactions are evolutionary stable only when both interacting species possess mechanisms to prevent excessive exploitation3–6. In light of this, it is paradoxical that some of the classical examples of coevolved obligate mutualism seemingly do not meet this criterion. In mutualisms involving seed parasites that actively pollinate their hosts, such as yucca/ yucca moth and fig/fig wasp interactions, there is no apparent means of retaliation on behalf of the plant. Predictions from theory suggest that a cryptic mechanism, such as selective abortion of flowers with heavy egg loads, could stabilize these interactions4,6–9. Here we present the first empirical evidence that such a mechanism in fact exists in the yucca/yucca moth interaction. A strong nega-tive effect exists between moth egg number and probability of flower retention. Furthermore, we show a strong positive effect between the number of pollinations received and the probability of flower retention. Selective maturation of fruit with low egg loads and high pollen loads provides a mechanism to increase the quantity and possibly quality of seeds produced, and simultaneously select against moths that lay many eggs per flower or provide low-quality pollinations4,6,8,10. Not only can these results explain the stability of this type of interaction, but selection for high-quality pollination also provides a mechanism to help explain the evolution of active pollination among yucca moths.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gehring, C. A. & Whitham, T. G. Nature 353, 556–557 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. McFall-Ngai, M. J. & Ruby, E. G. Science 254, 1491–1494 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trivers, R. L. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. Science 242, 1385–1390 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Soberon Mainero, J. & Martinez del Rio, C. in The Biology of Mutualism (ed. Boucher, D. H.) 192–216 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bull, J. J. & Rice, W. R. J. theor. Biol. 149, 63–74 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Janzen, D. J. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 13–51 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray, M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26, 69–81 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bronstein, J. in Plant-Insect Interactions Vol. 4 (ed. Bernays, E.) 1–44 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stephenson, A. G. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 253–279 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riley, C. V. A. Rep. MO Bot. Gard. 3, 99–158 (1892).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiester, A. R., Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. Am. Nat. 124, 220–243 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Addicott, J. F., Bronstein, J. & Kjellberg, F. in Genetics, Evolution and Coordination of Insect Life Cycles (ed. Gilbert, F.) 143–161 (Springer, London, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell, J. A. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 10–14 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pellmyr, O. & Thompson, J. N. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 2927–2929 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson, J. N. & Pellmyr, O. Ecology 73, 1780–1791 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pammel, L. H. Science 61, 414–415 (1925).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, D. R. Bull. US natn. Hist. Mus. 255, 1–170 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutherland, S. & Delph, L. F. Ecology 65, 1093–1104 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Udovic, D. & Aker, C. Oecologia 49, 245–248 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson, T. E. & Stephenson, A. G. Evolution 46, 1731–1739 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schlichting, C. D., Stephenson, A. G., Small, L. E. & Winsor, J. A. Evolution 44, 1358–1372 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. Evolution 37, 1210–1226 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jayne, B. C. & Bennett, A. F. Evolution 44, 1204–1229 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bogler, D. J. & Simpson, B. B. Kew R. Bot. Gard. Monocot. Symp. Abstr. 3 (1993).

  26. Sutherland, S. D. thesis, Univ. Arizona (1982).

  27. Trelease, W. A. Rep. MO Bot. Gard. 13, 27–133 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gentry, H. S. Agaves of Continental North America (Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Becerra, J. X. & Lloyd, D. G. Evolution 46, 458–469 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kingsolver, R. W. thesis, Univ. Kansas (1984).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellmyr, O., Huth, C. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372, 257–260 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/372257a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/372257a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing