Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Saturday 28 November 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 371, 594 - 595 (13 October 2002); doi:10.1038/371594a0

Direct demonstration of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in a superconductor

W. J. Elion, M. Matters, U. Geigenmüller & J. E. Mooij

Department of Applied Physics, Delft University of Technology and Delft Institute for Micro-Electronics and Submicron Technology (DIMES), PO Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands

A HEISENBERG uncertainty relation exists between any two non-commuting variables of a quantum-mechanical system. In a super-conductor, two such variables are the number, n, of Cooper pairs and the phase, phi, of the superconducting wavefunction. Suppress-ing fluctuations in either variable should lead to enhanced fluctua-tions in the other1,2. To demonstrate this effect, we have fabricated a structure in which the quantum-mechanical fluctuations in the phase of a superconducting grain can be suppressed. We measure the supercurrent that flows through two Josephson tunnel junctions of small capacitance that are connected to the grain. The capacit-ance of the grain is itself so small that the number of Cooper pairs is well defined—charge transport through the grain is possible only through quantum-mechanical fluctuations in n. The phase of the grain is coupled to a large superconducting reservoir such that the fluctuations in phi can be controllably suppressed. The enhanced fluctuations in n that result from this coupling give rise to a large increase in the supercurrent through the grain.

------------------

References
1. Tinkham, M. Introduction To Superconductivity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).
2. Anderson, P. W. in Progress in Low Temperature Physics Vol. V (ed. Gorter, C. J.) 1−43 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967).
3. Carruthers, P., Nieto, M. M. Rev. mod. Phys. 40, 411−440 (1968). | Article |
4. Josephson, B. D. Phys. Lett. 1, 251−253 (1962). | Article | ISI |
5. Averin, D. V. & Likharev, K. K. in Mesoscopic Phenomena in solids (eds Altshuler, B. L., Lee, P. A. & Webb, R. A.) 173−271 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).
6. Matveev, K. A., Gisselfält, M., Glazman, L. I., Jonson, M. & Shekter, R. I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2940−2943 (1993). | Article | PubMed |
7. Geerligs, L. J., Anderegg, V. F., Romijn, J. & Mooij, J. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 377−380 (1990). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
8. Tuominen, M. T., Hergenrother, J. M., Tighe, T. S. & Tinkham, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1997−2000 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
9. Joyez, P., Lafarge, P., Flipe, A., Esteve, D. & Devoret, M. H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2458−2461 (1994). | Article | PubMed | ISI |
10. Eiles, T. M. & Martinis, J. M. Phys. Rev. B50, 627−630 (1994). | ChemPort |
11. Haviland, D. B., Harada, Y., Delsing, P., Chen, C. D. & Claeson, T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1541−1544 (1994). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
12. Fulton, T. A., Gammel, P. L., Bishop, D. J. & Dunkleberger, L. N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1307−1310 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI |
13. Kautz, R. L. & Martinis, J. M. Phys. Rev. B42, 9903−9937 (1990).



© 2002 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy