Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies
J. R. Prendergast*†, R. M. Quinn*†, J. H. Lawton*, B. C. Eversham† & D. W. Gibbons‡
*NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
†Biological Records Centre, NERC Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Cambridgeshire PE17 2LS, UK
‡British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Nunnery Place, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK
SPECIES conservation in situ requires networks of protected areas selected for high conservation interest13. Throughout most of the world, however, there are neither the resources nor the time to carry out detailed inventories for most taxa2,4 before designating protected areas. Site selection (on grounds other than availability) would be easier and more effective if two things were true: (1) habitats that are species-rich for one taxon are also species-rich for others5; and (2) rare1 species occur in, and therefore benefit from the conservation of, species-rich habitats. Diversity (usually, species richness) and the presence of rare species are the most frequently cited criteria for site selection by conservationists68. Here, we use data on British plants and animals held by the Biological Records Centre (BRC)9 and the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), mapped on a grid of 10 km × 10 km ('10 km squares') to examine the extent to which species-rich areas for different taxa coincide, and whether species-rich areas contain substantial numbers of rare species. The fine scale and high intensity of recording in Britain produces distributional datasets at least as good as and, in most cases, better than those available elsewhere. For Britain at least, we do not find strong support for either proposition. Species-rich areas ('hotspots'10) frequently do not coincide for different taxa, and many rare species do not occur in the most species-rich squares.
||Soulé, M. (ed.) Conservation Biology (Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., 1986).
||Groombridge, B. (ed.) Global Diversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992).
||Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I. & Williams, P. H. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 124−128 (1993). | Article | ISI |
||Raven, P. H. & Wilson, E. O. Science, 258, 1099−1100 (1992).
||Pearson, D. L. & Cassola, F. Cons. Biol. 6, 376−391 (1992).
||Margules, C. & Usher, M. B. Biol. Conserv. 21, 79−109 (1981). | Article |
||Usher, M. B. (ed.) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation (Chapman & Hall, London, 1986).
||Scott, M. J. et al. Wildl. Monogr. 123, 1−41 (1993).
||Harding, P. T. & Sheail, J. Biological Recording of Changes in British Wildlife (ed. Harding, P. T.) 5−19 (HMSO, London, 1992).
||Myers, N. The Environmentalist 8, 187−208 (1988). | PubMed | ChemPort |
||Kremen, C. Ecol. Appl. 2, 203−217 (1992).
||Rorslett, B. Aquat. Bot. 39, 173−179 (1991).
||Williams, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Biol. Conserv. (in the press).
||Dury, W. H. Biol. Conserv. 6, 162−169 (1974).
||Rabinowitz, D. Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation (ed. Synge. H.) 205−217 (Wiley, New York, 1981).
||Thomas, C. D. & Mallorie, H. C. Biol. Conserv. 33, 95−117 (1985). | Article |
||Perring, F. H. & Farrell, L. British Red Data Books: 1, Vascular Plants 2nd edn (RSNC, Nettleham, 1983).
||Stewart, A. & Pearman, D. BSBI (Botanical Society of the British Isles) News 57, 17−21 (1991).
||International Council for Bird Preservation Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation (International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, 1992).
||Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235−254 (1991). | Article |
||Crozier, R. H. Biol. Conserv. 61, 11−15 (1992). | Article |
||Gibbons, D. W., Reid, J. B. & Chapman, R. A. The New Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988−91 (in the press).
||Prendergast, J. R., Wood, S. N., Lawton, J. H. & Eversham, B. C. Biodiversity Lett. (in the press).
© 1993 Nature Publishing Group