Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence

Abstract

ANIMALS exhibit a diversity of colour patterns that are commonly used in interspecific and intraspecific communication1–3. Factors influencing the evolution of signals used in communication include the properties of the physical environment in which the signal is generated2–10, the perceptual systems of individuals (such as potential mates or predators) receiving the signal2,3,11–16, and the nature of the information signalled. In warblers of the genus Phylloscopus, species differences in colour patterns are correlated with light intensity of the habitat: brighter species live in darker habitats. I report here two observations that colour patterns function to increase conspicuousness, and are used in intraspecific communication. First, individuals make themselves temporarily more conspicuous by flashing the bright colour patterns in display, and are less conspicuous when not displaying. Second, experimentally increasing conspicuousness of males within a given habitat increases territory size, whereas experimentally reducing conspicuousness results in either a smaller territory or its total loss. Traits used in intraspecific communication are often thought to diverge as a result of variation in perceptual systems2,3,13,15–17. This study shows that variation in the physical environment can cause species divergence, and this will occur whether perceptual systems are variable or relatively constant.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burt, E. H. Jr Ornithol. Monogr. 38 (1986).

  2. Ryan, M. J. in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology (eds Futuyma, D. & Antonovics, J.) 156–175 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Endler, J. A. Am. Nat. 139, sl25–sl53 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morton, E. S. Am. Nat. 109, 17–34 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan, M. J. & Brenowitz, E. A. Am. Nat. 126, 87–100 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Endler, J. A. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315–352 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, M. J., Cocroft, R. B. & Wilczynski, W. Evolution 44, 1869–1872 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thery, M. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 45, 215–236 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Endler, J. A. Vision Res. 31, 587–608 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Endler, J. A. Ecological Monographs (in the press).

  11. Lande, R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 3721–3725 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan, M. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 1379–1382 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Endler, J. A. & McLellan, T. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 19, 395–421 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. Evolution 44, 305–314 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilcyzynski, W. & Rand, A. S. Nature 343, 66–67 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Basolo, A. L. Science 250, 808–810 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Price, T. J. anim. Ecol. 60, 643–664 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williamson, K. The Genus Phylloscopus (British Trust for Ornithology, Oxford, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Endler, J. A. Evol. Biol. 11, 319–364 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richman, A. D. & Price, T. Nature 335, 817–821 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Felsenstein, J. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaston, A. J. Ibis 116, 432–450 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shutler, D. & Weatherhead, P. J. Evolution 44, 1967–1977 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rohwer, S. Anim. Behav. 33, 1325–1331 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Edmunds, M. Defence in Animals (Longman, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dunn, J. F. Exposure Manual (Fountain, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Price, T. & Jamdar, N. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 88, 1–19 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchetti, K. Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence. Nature 362, 149–152 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/362149a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/362149a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing