Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Do virtual geomagnetic poles follow preferred paths during geomagnetic reversals?

Abstract

VIRTUAL geomagnetic poles (VGPs) recorded in sediments during reversals of the Earth's magnetic field show an apparent preference for two antipodal sectors of longitude1–3, not only in records of the same reversal from different sites, but also in records of different reversals. If preferred bands really have persisted from one reversal to the next, this would imply that the mantle exerts a significant control over the reversal process4. Here we analyse the available database of reversal records from the past 12 Myr, using a statistical test specifically designed to test the hypothesis of two preferred antipodal longitudinal bands. Our analysis shows that the records, taken as a group of independent observations, do show an overall preference for two antipodal longitudinal bands. However, the site longitudes are also strongly grouped5, and a comparison of the transitional VGP longitudes with site longitudes shows an unlikely grouping under the hypothesis of a genuine geographical preference for transitional VGPs. We conclude that it is premature to accept the hypothesis of mantle control over the core during geomagnetic reversals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tric, E. et al. Phys. Earth planet int. 65, 319–336 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gubbins, D. Eos 72, 132 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clement, B. M. & Kent, D. V. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 81–84 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laj, C. et al. Nature 351, 447 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Valet, J.-P., Tucholka, P., Courtillot, V. & Meynadier, L. Nature 356, 400–407 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laj, C. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2003–2006 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laj,, C. et al. Nature 359, 111–112 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mardia, K. V. Statistics of Directional Data (Academic, London, 1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Rothman, E. D. Sankhya A34, 23–32 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Egbert, G. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2353–2356 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman, K. A. Nature 359, 789–794 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Constable, C. Nature 358, 230–233 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barton, C. E. et al. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 61, 355–377 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McFadden, P., Barton, C. & Merrill, R. Do virtual geomagnetic poles follow preferred paths during geomagnetic reversals?. Nature 361, 342–344 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/361342a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/361342a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing