Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Role of pore fluids in the generation of seismic precursors to shear fracture

Abstract

A SYSTEMATIC study of temporal changes in seismic b-values (defined as the log-linear slope of the earthquake frequency–magnitude distribution) has shown that large earthquakes are often preceded by an intermediate-term increase in b, followed by a decrease in the months to weeks before the earthquake1. The onset of the b-value increase can precede earthquake occurrence by as much as 7 years. A recently proposed fracture mechanics model of the earthquake source2 explains these temporal fluctuations in b in terms of the underlying physical processes of time-varying applied stress and crack growth. The model predicts two minima in b, separated by a short-lived maximum. Here we report the results of controlled laboratory deformation experiments, done in simulated upper-crustal conditions on both air-dried and water-saturated rock specimens. As found in previous experiments3–5, shear fracture in dry specimens is characterized by a decline in b during anelastic deformation to a single minimum reached just before failure. But in water-saturated specimens, when pore-fluid volume is kept constant by servo-control we also observe a second, intermediate-term b-value minimum, so reproducing the double b-value anomaly predicted by the model2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, W. D. Nature 289, 136–139 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Main, I. G., Meredith, P. G. & Jones, C. Geophys. J. 96, 131–138 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meredith, P. G., Main, I. G. & Jones, C. Tectonophysics 175, 249–268 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sammonds, P. R., Ayling, M. R., Meredith, P. G., Murrell, S. A. F. & Jones, C. in Rock at Great Depth (eds Maury, V. & Fourmaintraux, D.) (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lockner, D. A., Byerlee, J. D., Kiksenko, V., Ponomarev, A. & Sidorin, A. Nature 350, 39–42 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mogi, K. Earthquake Prediction (Academic, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson, B. K. & Meredith, P. G. in Fracture Mechanics of Rock (ed. Atkinson, B. K.) (Academic, London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meredith, P. G. & Atkinson, B. K. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 75, 1–21 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Main, I. Geophys. J. 92, 455–464 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Seggern, D. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 86, 815–838 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Utsu, T. Geophys. Mag. 30, 521–605 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nur, A. M. & Walder, J. in The Role of Fluids in Crustal Processes (panel co-chair Bredehoeft, J. D. & Norton, D. L.) (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marquis, G. & Hyndman, R. D. Geophys. J. int. 110, 91–105 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scholz, C. H., Sykes, L. R. & Aggarwal, Y. P. Science 181, 803–810 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rice, J. R. Extended Abstr. int. Symp. Earthq. Source Phys. Earthq. Precursors 7–11 (Univ. of Tokyo, 1990).

  16. Aki, K. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 43, 237–239 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sammonds, P., Meredith, P. & Main, I. Role of pore fluids in the generation of seismic precursors to shear fracture. Nature 359, 228–230 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/359228a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/359228a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing