Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Monday 23 November 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 358, 756 - 758 (27 August 1992); doi:10.1038/358756a0

Mixed parvocellular and magnocellular geniculate signals in visual area V4

Vincent P. Ferrera, Tara A. Nealey & John H. R. Maunsell*

Department of Physiology and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642-8642, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

VISUAL information from the retina is transmitted to the cerebral cortex by way of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) in the thalamus. In primates, most of the retinal ganglion cells that project to the LGN belong to one of two classes, P and M, whose axons terminate in the parvocellular or magnocellular subdivisions of the LGN. These cell classes give rise to two channels that have been distinguished anatomically, physiologically and behaviourally1–3,16,17. The visual cortex also can be subdivided into two pathways, one specialized for motion processing and the other for colour and form information4. Several lines of indirect evidence have suggested a close correspondence between the subcortical and cortical pathways, such that the M channel provides input to the motion pathway and the P channel drives the colour/form pathway5–7. This hypothesis was tested directly by selectively inactivating either the magnocellular or parvocellular subdivision of the LGN and recording the effects on visual responses in the cortex. We have previously reported that, in accordance with the hypothesis, responses in the motion pathway in the cortex depend primarily on magnocellular LGN8. We now report that in the colour/form pathway, visual responses depend on both P and M input. These results argue against a simple correspondence between the subcortical and cortical pathways.

------------------

References
1. Shapley, R. & Perry, V. H. Trends Neurosci. 9, 229−235 (1986). | Article | ISI |
2. Silveira, L. C. L. & Perry, V. H. Neuroscience 40, 217−237 (1991). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
3. Schiller, P. H., Logothetis, N. K. & Charles, E. R. Vis. Neurosci. 5, 321−346 (1990). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
4. Ungerleider, L. G. & Mishkin, M. Analysis of Visual Behavior (eds Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. J. W.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982).
5. Llvingstone, M. S. & Hubel, D. H. Science 240, 740−749 (1988). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
6. Maunsell, J. H. R. Matters of Intelligence (ed. Vaina, L. M.) (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).
7. Maunsell, J. H. R. & Newsome, W. T. A. Rev. Neurosci, 10, 363−401 (1987). | ChemPort |
8. Maunsell, J. H. R., Nealey, T. A. & DePriest, D. D. J. Neurosci. 10, 3323−3334 (1991).
9. Malpeli, J. G. & Schiller, P. H. J. Neurosci. Meth. 1, 143−157 (1979). | ChemPort |
10. Felleman, D. J. & Van Essen, D. C. Cerebral Cortex 1, 1−47 (1991). | PubMed | ChemPort |
11. Malpeli, J. G., Schiller, P. H. & Colby, C. L. J. Neurophysiol. 46, 1102−1119 (1981). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
12. Nealey, T. A. & Maunsell, J. H. R. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 32, 1117 (1991).
13. Blasdel, G. G., Lund, J. S. & Fitzpatrick, D. J. Neurosci. 5, 3350−3369 (1985). | PubMed | ChemPort |
14. Fitzpatrick, D., Lund, J. S. & Blasdel, G. G. J. Neurosci. 5, 3329−3349 (1985). | PubMed | ChemPort |
15. Lachica, E. A., Beck, P. D. & Casagrande, V. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 3566−3570 (1992). | ChemPort |
16. Merigan, W. H., Byrne, C. & Maunsell, J. H. R. J. Neurosci. 11, 3422−3429 (1991). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
17. Merigan, W. H., Katz, L. M. & Maunsell, J. H. R. J. Neurosci. 11, 994−1001 (1991). | PubMed | ChemPort |
18. Schiller, P. H., Logothetis, N. K. & Charles, E. R. Vis. Neurosci. 5, 321−346 (1990). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1992 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy