The following article, published for completeness, was completed on 30 September 1987, was submitted to Nature soon afterwards, but never published. Those consulted about the manuscript held that there might be data, other than that in the seventeen pages of laboratory notebooks analysed by the authors, that would undermine their conclusions. Such supplementary data have indeed been submitted, but have been judged by the draft report of the Office of Scientific Integrity to have been fabricated.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Weaver, D., Reis, M. H. Albanese, C., Costantini, F., Baltimore, D. & Imanishi-Kari, T. Cell 45, 247–59 (1986).
Grosschedl, R., Weaver, D., Baltimore, D. & Costantini, F. Cell 38, 647–658 (1984).
Kung, J. T., Sharrow, S. O., Sieckmann, D.G., Lieberman, R. & Paul, W. E. J. Immun. 127, 873–876 (1981).
Velardi, A., Kubagawa, H. & Kearney, J. F. J. Immun. 133, 2,323–31 (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, W., Feder, N. Analysis of a whistle-blowing. Nature 351, 687–691 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/351687a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/351687a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
