Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Saturday 11 July 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 348, 647 - 649 (13 December 1990); doi:10.1038/348647a0

Point mutation in the exoplasmic domain of the erythropoietin receptor resulting in hormone-independent activation and tumorigenicity

Akihiko Yoshimura*, Gregory Longmore*† & Harvey F. Lodish*‡

*Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Nine Cambridge Center,Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
Division of Hematology and Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

THE receptors for erythropoietin and other cytokines constitute a new superfamily1–4. They have no tyrosine-kinase or other enzyme motif and their signal-transducing mechanism is unclear. Here we describe two classes of activating mutations in the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR). A single point mutation in the exoplasmic domain enables it to induce hormone-independent cell growth and tumorigenesis after expression in nontumorigenic, interleukin-3-dependent haematopoietic cells. A C-terminal truncation in the cytoplasmic domain of the EPOR renders the receptor hyper-responsive to erythropoietin, but is insufficient to induce hormone-independent growth or tumorigenicity. The activating point mutation retards intracellular transport and turnover of the receptor. These alterations in metabolism and tumorigenicity caused by the EPOR with activating point mutations are similar to those observed in erythropoietin-independent activation of the wild type EPOR by association with gp55, the Friend spleen focus-forming virus glycoprotein5,6.

------------------

References
1. D'Andrea, A. D., Fasman, G. D. & Lodish, H. F. Cell 58, 1023−1024 (1989). | PubMed |
2. Itoh, N. et al. Science 247, 324−327 (1990). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
3. Bazan, J. F. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 164, 788−795 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
4. Fukunaga, R., Ikeda, E. I., Seto, Y. & Nagata, S. Cell 61, 341−350 (1990). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
5. Li, J.-P., D'Andrea, A. D., Lodish, H. F. & Baltimore, D. Nature 343, 762−764 (1990). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
6. Yoshimura, A., D'Andrea, A. D. & Lodish, H. F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 4139−4143 (1990). | ChemPort |
7. D'Andrea, A. D., Lodish, H. F. & Wong, G. G. Cell 57, 277−285 (1989). | PubMed |
8. Hatakeyama, M., Mori, H., Doi, T. & Taniguchi, T. Cell 59, 837−845 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
9. Bestwick, R. K., Kozak, S. L. & Kabat, D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 5404−5408 (1988). | ChemPort |
10. Danos, O. & Mulligan, R. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 6460−6464 (1988). | ChemPort |
11. Saiki, R. K. et al. Science 239, 487−491 (1988). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
12. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5463−5467 (1977). | ChemPort |
13. Woolford, J., McAuliffe, A. & Rohrschneider, L. R. Cell 55, 965−977 (1988). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
14. Roussel, M. F., Downing, J. R., Rettenmier, C. W. & Sherr, C. J. Cell 55, 979−988 (1988). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
15. Roussel, et al. Nature 325, 549−552 (1987). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
16. Roussel, M. F., Downing, J. R. & Sherr, C. J. Oncogene 5, 25−30 (1990). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
17. Schrader, J. W. & Crapper, R. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 6892−6896 (1983). | ChemPort |
18. Schrader, J. W. A. Rev. Immun. 4, 205−230 (1986). | ChemPort |
19. Taga, T. & Kishimoto, T. Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 2, 174−180 (1990). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
20. Lang, R. A., Metcalf, D., Gough, N. M., Dunn, A. R. & Gonda, T. J. Cell 43, 531−542 (1985). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1990 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy