Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

High productivity of northern Bering Sea benthic amphipods

Abstract

POLAR regions, particularly Arctic seas covered by ice for a significant portion of the year, have been considered to be relatively unproductive1–4. In the western Arctic, including the northern Bering Sea, high water column productivity5,6, and well developed benthic communities7–9 have recently been reported. Ampeliscid amphipod crustaceans are the benthic community dominants in vast areas of the northern Bering Sea and are the major prey of the migratory California grey whale, Eschrichtius robustus10,11. Our study indicates that productivity of the benthic amphipods is remarkably high, given the latitude. The dominant species, Ampelisca macrocephala, is the most productive benthic marine amphipod ever reported and the amphipod community is more productive then entire benthic communities investigated elsewhere. biomassPolar marine ecosystems clearly have the potential to be highly productive

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conover, R. in Zoogeography and Diversity of Plankton (ed. Van der Spoet, S. & Pierrot-Butts, A.) 50–86 (Halsted, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. George, R. in Polar Oceans (ed. Dunbar, M.) 391–408 (Arctic Institutes of North America, Calgary, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knox, G. & Lowry, J. in Polar Oceans (ed. Dunbar, M.) 423–462 (Arctic Institute of North America, Calgary, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raymont, J. Plankton and Productivity in the Oceans Vol. 1 2nd edn (Pergamon, London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sambrotto, R., Goering, J. & McRoy, C. Science 225, 1147–1150 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh, J. et al. in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the Comité Artique International, 13–15 May 1985 (eds Rey, L. & Alexander, V.) 90–120 (Brill, Leiden, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stoker, S. in The Eastern Bering Sea Shelf: Oceanography and Resources, Vol. 2 (eds Hood, D. W. & Calder, J. A.) 1069–1090 (University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grebmeier, J., McRoy, C. & Feder, H. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 48, 57–67 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grebmeier, J., Feder, H. & McRoy, C. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 51, 253–268 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogosiovskaya, L., Votrogov, L. & Semenova, T. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. 31, 507–510 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nerini, M. in The Gray Whale Eschrichtius robustus (eds Jones, M. L., Swartz, S. L. & Leatherwood, S.) 423–450 (Academic, New York, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, K. & Nelson, C. Science 225, 1150–1152 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson, C., Johnson, K. & Barber, J. Jr J. Sed. Petrol. 57, 419–430 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Springer, A. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Alaska, Fairbanks (1988).

  15. Crisp, D. in Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos (eds Holme, N. & Mclntyre, A.) 284–372 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wildish, D. & Peer, D. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38, 1019–1025 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coachman, L., Aagaard, K. & Tripp, R. Bering Strait. The Regional Physical Oceanography (University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanneworff, E. Ophelia 2, 305–318 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Collie, J. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 22, 229–238 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carrasco, F. & Arcos, D. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14, 245–252 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanhope, M. & Levings, C. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 1733–1740 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dauvin, J.-C. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 128, 31–56 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dauvin, J.-C. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 123, 235–252 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Coyle, K. & Highsmith, R. J. crust. Biol. 9, 157–175 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders, H. Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 15, 344–414 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Steimle, F. in Georges Bank (eds Backus, R. H. & Bourne, D. W.) 310–314 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons, T., Takahashi, M. & Hargrave, B. Biological Oceanographic Processes (Pergamon, Oxford, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mann, K. Ecology of Coastal Waters: A Systems Approach (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Highsmfth, R., Coyle, K. High productivity of northern Bering Sea benthic amphipods. Nature 344, 862–864 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/344862a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/344862a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing