Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A cost of mating in female fruitflies

Abstract

COSTS of reproduction occur when an increase in reproductive rate reduces future reproduction by increasing mortality or reducing fertility. Such costs have been demonstrated in plants and animals in laboratory and field studies1–5. Their importance lies in their possible role in the evolution of life histories and of senescence6–15. An understanding of their mechanisms will also reveal the nature of the physiological constraints on longevity and fertility. Most accounts assume that these occur as a result of competition for nutrient allocation between growth, storage, somatic maintenance and reproduction16–21. An increase in reproductive rate would then result in a denial of nutrients to other processes, resulting in a drop in life expectancy or future fertility. Some support for this point of view comes from the finding that lifespan is lengthened in female Drosophila melanogaster that have inactive or absent ovaries22–23 or that are experimentally induced to produce fewer eggs24. Increased exposure to males, however, also results in a drop in lifespan24–26. We show here that mating with males greatly reduces lifespan in female fruitflies whose rates of egg-production and egg-fertility do not differ, suggesting both that simple nutrient allocation to reproduction is not its only physiological cost, and that males can cause females to remate at a frequency that results in reduced female lifetime reproductive success.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, G. & Koufapanou, V. in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology Vol. 3 (eds Dawkins, R. & Ridley, M.) 83–131 (Oxford University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reznick, D. Oikos 44, 257–267 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Partridge, L. & Harvey, P. H. Science 241, 1449–1454 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustaffson, L. & Sutherland, W. J. Nature 335, 813–815 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Partridge, L. in Lifetime Reproduction in Birds (ed. Newton, I.) (Academic, London, in the press).

  6. Williams, G. C. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, G. C. Am. Nat. 100, 687–690 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 12, 12–45 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gadgil, M. & Bossert, W. Am. Nat. 104, 1–24 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Charnov, E. L. & Krebs, J. R. Ibis 116, 217–219 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pianka, E. R. & Parker, W. S. Am. Nat. 109, 453–464 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Partridge, L. Funct. Ecol. 1, 317–320 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rose, M. R. Evolution 38, 1004–1010 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luckinbill, L. S. et al. Evolution 38, 996–1003 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Dover, New York, 1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkwood, T. B. L. Nature 270, 301–304 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Calow, P. Biol. Rev. 54, 23–40 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirkwood, T. B. L. in Physiological Ecology (eds Townsend, C. R. & Calow, P.) 165–189 (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirkwood, T. B. L. & Holliday, R. Proc. R. Soc. B 205, 531–546 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bryant, D. M. Funct. Ecol. 2, 23–34 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maynard Smith, J. J. exp. Biol. 35, 832–842 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lamb, M. J. J. Insect Physiol. 10, 487–497 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Partridge, L., Green, A. & Fowler, K. J. Insect Physiol. 33, 745–749 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Partridge, L. et al. J. Insect Physiol. 32, 925–929 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luckinbill, L. S. et al. Evol. Ecol. 2, 85–94 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trevitt, S., Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. J. Insect Physiol. 34, 821–828 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Partridge, L., Hoffmann, A. & Jones, J. S. Anim. Behav. 35, 468–476 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Walker, W. F. Am. Nat. 115, 780–799 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowler, K., Partridge, L. A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338, 760–761 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/338760a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/338760a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing