Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Percussion marks on bone surfaces as a new diagnostic of hominid behaviour

Abstract

Since stone tool cut marks and carnivore tooth marks were first described systematically on Plio-Pleistocene archaeological bone1,2, bone surface modification has played a prominent role in interpreting early archaeological site formation and hominid behaviour3–15. Here we introduce a new class of bone surface modification, which we call percussion marks. Percussion marks were produced during experimental breakage of marrow bones, and occur as pits or grooves impressed on a bone's surface by natural protrusions on the granitic hammerstone and anvil used. Although percussion marks can superficially mimic carnivore tooth marks, they nonetheless are closely associated with hammerstone impact notches and show consistent micromorphological features which distinguish them from tooth marks and other classes of bone surface modification. Given indications of prehistoric hammer-stone breakage of marrow bones1,7, an awareness of percussion marks is critical for accurately identifying the biological agents of bone modification at archaeological sites and provides a new diagnostic of carcass processing by hominids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bunn, H. T. Nature 291, 574–577 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Potts, R. & Shipman, P. Nature 291, 577–580 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Behrensmeyer, A. K., Gordon, K. D. & Yanagi, G. T. Nature 319, 768–771 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Binford, L. R. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths (Academic, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenschine, R. J. Curr. Anthrop. 28, 383–407 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumenschine, R. J. J. archaeol. Sci. (in the press).

  7. Bunn, H. T. in Animals and Archaeology: Hunters and their Prey Vol. 1 (eds Clutton-Brock, J. & Grigson, C.) 21–30 (British Archaeological Rep. Int. Ser. 163, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bunn, H. T. & Blumenschine, R. J. Am. Anthrop. 89, 444–448 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunn, H. T. & Kroll, E. M. Curr. Anthrop. 27, 431–452 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyman, R. L. Adv. archaeol. Meth. Theory 10, 249–337 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall, F. J. hum. Evol. 15, 661–672 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Potts, R. in Animals and Archaeology: Hunters and their Prey Vol. 1 (eds Clutton-Brock, J. & Grigson, C.) 51–62 (British Archaeological Rep. Int. Ser. 163, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shipman, P. in Animals and Archaeology: Hunters and their Prey Vol. 1 (eds Clutton-Brock, J. & Grigson, C.) 31–49 (British Archaeological Rep. Int. Ser. 163, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shipman, P. Am. Anthrop. 88, 27–43 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shipman, P. & Rose, J. J. anthrop. Archaeol. 2, 57–98 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman, L. G. Curr. Anthrop. 24, 366–373 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrews, P. & Cooke, J. Man. 20, 675–691 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blumenschine, R. J. & Selvaggio, M. M. in Proc. 11th Congress Union Int. Sci. Prehisioriques Protohistoriques, Mainz, FRG, September 1987 (in the press).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leakey, M. D. Olduvai Gorge: Excavations in Beds I & II, 1960–1963 Vol. 3 (Cambridge-University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Potts, R. Am. Scient. 72, 338–347 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, E. Adv. Archaeol. Meth. Theory 8, 157–235 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonnischsen, R. in Early Man In America from a Circum-Pacific Perspective (ed. Bryan, A. L.) 102–118 (Archaeological Researchers International, Edmonton, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bryan, A. L. in Early Man in America from a Circum-Pacific Perspective (ed. Bryan, A. L.) 306–327 (Archaeological Researchers International, Edmonton, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haynes, G. Am. Antiq. 48, 102–114 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Irving, W. N. & Harington, C. R. Science 179, 335–340 (1973).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morlan, R. E. in Pre-Llano Cultures of the Americas: Paradoxes and Possibilities (eds Humphrey, R. L. & Stanford, D.) 125–145 (Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington DC., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Myers, T. P., Voorhies, M. & Corner, R. G. Am. Antiq. 45, 483–490 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadek–Kooros, H. Am. Antiq. 37, 369–382 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stanford, D. Nat. geogr. Mag. 155, 114–119 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bunn, H. T. in Bone Modification (eds Bonnichsen, R. & Sorg, M.) (Center for the Study of Early Man, Orono, Maine, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blumenschine, R., Selvaggio, M. Percussion marks on bone surfaces as a new diagnostic of hominid behaviour. Nature 333, 763–765 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/333763a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/333763a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing