Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 333, 358 - 361 (26 May 1988); doi:10.1038/333358a0

A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies

Peter C. Frumhoff*‡ & Jayne Baker†‡

*Ecology Graduate Group and Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Present addresses Departments of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (PC F ), Department of Zoology NJ15, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

Division of labour among nestmate workers is central to the colonial organization and ecological success of the eusocial Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps)1. Workers characteristically divide labour through (1) ontogenetic changes in individual behaviour2,3 and (2) inter-individual variation in behavioural repertoire3,4. On the basis of current evidence, optimization models of colony demography3,5,6 assume that variation among nestmates in behavioural repertoire arises solely through variation in environmental conditions, such as larval nutrition (inducing size-mediated behavioural differences in many ants)3,4,7 and adult experience (effecting behavioural differences among morphologically similar nestmates)8. A possible genetic component to division of labour, however, has received little study9. Yet, the degree of genetic heterogeneity among workers within Hymenopteran colonies is often extremely high10, a consequence of multiple mating by the queen (polyandry11,12) and/or the presence of multiple laying t (J B ) queens (polygyny13). Here we report evidence of genetically based variation in task performance among nestmate workers in the polyandrous honey bee Apis mellifera L. Such variation may be an important component to division of labour within genetically heterogeneous colonies.

------------------

References
1. Wilson, E. O. Science 228, 1489−1495 (1985).
2. Michener, C. D. The Social Behavior of the Bees (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1974).
3. Oster, G. F. & Wilson, E. O. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978).
4. Calabi, P. in Advances in Myrmecology (ed. Arnett, R. H. Jr) (Brill, Leiden, 1988).
5. Wilson, E. O. Fortschr. Zool. 31, 307−324 (1985).
6. Franks, N. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 72−75 (1987). | Article |
7. Brian, M. V. in Social Insects Vol. I (ed. Hermann, H. R.) 121−222 (Academic, New York, 1979).
8. Jeanne, R. L. Interindividual Behavioral Variability in Social Insects (Westview, Boulder, 1988).
9. Craig, R. & Crozier, R. H. Isozyme Bull. 11, 66−67 (1978).
10. Gadagkar, R. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 94, 587−621 (1985).
11. Page, R. E. & Metcalf, R. A. Am. Nat. 119, 263−281 (1982). | Article | ISI |
12. Ross, K. G. Nature 323, 798−800 (1986). | Article |
13. Rissing, S. W. & Pollack, G. B. in Interindividual Behavioral Variability in Social Insects (ed. Jeanne, R. L.) 179−222 (Westview, Boulder, 1988).
14. Winston, M. L. The Biology of the Honey Bee (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
15. Laidlaw, H. H. & Page, R. E. Genetics 108, 985−997 (1984). | ISI |
16. Peng, Y., Fang, Y., Xu, S. & Ge, L. J. invert. Pathol. 49, 54−60 (1987). | Article |
17. Nixon, H. L. & Ribbands, C. R. Proc. Roy. Soc. 140, 43−50 (1952). | ChemPort |
18. Free, J. B. Br. J. Anim. Behav. 5, 41−47 (1957).
19. Seeley, T. D. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 287−293 (1982). | Article |
20. Page, R. E., Kimsey, R. B. & Laidlaw, H. H. Experientia 40, 182−184 (1984).
21. Milum, V. G. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Entomol. 4, 1085−1088 (1956).
22. Korst, P. J. A. M. & Velthuis, H. H. W. Insectes Soc. 29, 209−221 (1982).
23. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1975).
24. Winston, M. L. & Katz, S. J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10, 125−129 (1982). | Article |
25. Collins, A. M., Rinderer, T. E., Harbo, J. R. & Bolten, A. B. Science 218, 72−74 (1982).
26. Rothenbuhler, W. C. Amer. Zool. 4, 111−123 (1964).
27. Hellmich, R. L., Kulincevic, J. M. & Rothenbuhler, W. C. J. Heredity 76, 155−158 (1985).
28. Calderone, N. W. & Page, R. E. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. (in the press).
29. Crozier, R. H. & Page, R. E. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 105−115 (1985). | Article | ISI |
30. Sherman, P. W., Seeley, T. D. & Reeve, H. K. Am. Nat. (in the press).
31. Crozier, R. H. & Consul, P. C. Theor. pop. Biol. 10, 1−9 (1976). | ChemPort |
32. Kolmes, S. A. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc 58, 413−421 (1985).
33. Winston, M. L. & Fergusson, L. A. Can. J. Zool. 63, 777−780 (1985). | ISI |
34. Moritz, R. F. A. & Southwick, E. E. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 53−57 (1987). | Article |
35. Robinson, G. E. & Page, R. E. Nature 333, 356−358 (1988). | Article |
36. Cohen, A. C. Jr Biometrics 16, 203−211 (1960).
37. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1981).
38. Tucker, K. W. in Bee Genetics and Breeding (ed. T. E. Rinderer) 57−90 (Academic, Orlando, 1986).



© 1988 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy