Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 332, 356 - 357 (24 March 1988); doi:10.1038/332356a0

Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension

M. Lehrer*, M. V. Srinivasan, S. W. Zhang* & G. A. Horridge

Centre for Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
* Present addresses: Zoologisches Institut der Universitat Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland (M.L.); Institute of Biophysics, Academia Sinica, Beijing, China (S.W.Z.)

To extract the third dimension from a two-dimensional retinal image most insects, including bees, cannot rely on mechanisms common in vertebrates such as accommodation, binocular convergence or stereoscopic vision1,2. Instead, they use the apparent size of familiar objects (the nearer the object, the larger its image), and objects' apparent motion (the nearer an object, the higher the speed of its image) 3–8. In several studies9–12 bees have been found to exploit size cues, whereas in others6,11,13 they seem to use both strategies. We have studied the influence of motion cues in isolation by excluding size cues. We report that bees can discriminate between objects at different distances irrespective of their size. This discrimination is mediated primarily by the green-sensitive visual channel and is therefore colour blind, like all of the motion-dependent behaviours investigated so far in the bee14–17. The bee's ability to discriminate range by motion of the image explains how bees manage to manoeuvre in novel environments, where the size of objects is unknown.

------------------

References
1. Horridge, G. A. Endeavour 1, 7−17 (1977). | Article | ISI |
2. Collett, T. S. & Harkness, L. I. K. in Analysis of Visual Behaviour (eds Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. J. W.) 111−176 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982).
3. Gibson, E. J., Gibson, J. J. & Smith, O. W. J. exp. Psychol. 58, 40−51 (1959). | PubMed | ChemPort |
4. Wallace, G. K. J. exp. Biol. 36, 512−525 (1959). | ISI |
5. Collett, T. S. J. exp. Biol. 76, 237−241 (1978). | ISI |
6. Cartwright, B. A. & Collett, T. S. J. exp. Biol. 82, 367−372 (1979). | ISI |
7. Erikson, E. S. J. exp. Biol. 86, 337−340 (1980).
8. Horridge, G. A. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B229, 23−27 (1986).
9. Lauer, J. & Lindauer, M. Informationsaufnahme und Informationsbearbeitung im lebenden Organismus Vol. 1, 1−87 (Steiner, Wiesbaden, 1971).
10. Maurer, B. thesis, Univ. Zurich (1980).
11. Lehrer, M. thesis, Univ. Zurich (1980).
12. Cartwright, B. A. & Collett, T. S. J. comp. Physiol. 151, 521−543 (1983). | Article | ISI |
13. Cheng, K., Collett, T. S., Pickhard, A. & Wehner, R. J. comp. Physiol. 161, 469−475 (1987). | Article |
14. Kaiser, W. & Liske, E. J. J. comp. Physiol. 89, 391−408 (1974). | Article |
15. Srinivasan, M. V. & Lehrer, M. J. comp. Physiol. 155, 297−312 (1984). | Article |
16. Lehrer, M., Wehner, R. & Srinivsan, M. V. J. comp. Physiol. 157, 405−415 (1985). | Article | ChemPort |
17. Srinivasan, M. V. & Lehrer, M. J. comp. Physiol. 162, 159−172 (1988). | Article |
18. Erber, J. J. comp. Physiol. 146, 273−282 (1982). | Article |



© 1988 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy