Abstract
Conventional, intensive tillage farming systems have greatly increased crop production and labour efficiency. But, serious questions are being raised about the energy-intensive nature of these systems and their adverse effects on soil productivity and environmental quality1,2. This concern has led to an increasing interest in organic farming systems because they may reduce some of the negative effects of conventional agriculture on the environment3,4. We compare the long-term effects (since 1948) of organic and conventional farming on selected properties of the same soil. The organically-farmed soil had significantly higher organic matter content, thicker topsoil depth, higher polysaccharide content, lower modulus of rupture and less soil erosion than the conventionally-farmed soil. This study indicates that, in the long term, the organic farming system was more effective than the conventional farming system in reducing soil erosion and, therefore, in maintaining soil productivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. Bidwell, O. W. J. Soil Wat. Conserv. 41, 317-320 (1986). 2. Papendick, R. I., Elliott, L. F. & Dahlgren, R. B. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 1, 3-10 (1986). 3. Vereijken, P. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 34, 387-393 (1986). 4. Clancy, K. L. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 1, 11-18 (1986). 5. US Department of Agriculture Report and Recommendations on Organic Farming (US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1980). 6. Jenny, H. Factors of Soil Formation (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941). 7. Soil Conservation Service and Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. Soil Survey of Spokane County, Washington (US Dept Agriculture, US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1968). 8. Bolton, H. Jr, Elliott, L. F., Papendick, R. I. & Bezdicek, D. F. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 297-302 (1985). 9. Lockertz, W., Shearer, G. & Kohl, D. H. Science 211, 540-547 (1981). 10. Oelhaf, R. C. Organic Agriculture (Allanheid, Osmun, Montclair, 1978). 11. Allison, F. E. Soil Organic Matter and Its Role in Crop Production (Elsevier, New York, 1973). 12. Johnston, A. E. Soil Use Mngt 2, 97-105 (1986). 13. Lynch, J. M. J. gen. Microbiol. 126, 371-375 (1981). 14. Molope, M. B., Grieve, I. C. & Page, E. R. /. Soil Sci. 38, 71-77 (1987). 15. Weilgart Patton, A. G. thesis, Washington State Univ. (1982). 16. Soil Conservation Service, Forest Service, and Economics, Statistics and Cooperatives Service Palouse Co-operative River Basin Study (US Dept of Agriculture, Washington, 1979). 17. Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Washington State University Agricutural Research Center Soil Survey of Whitman County, Washington (US Dept of Agriculture, US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1980). 18. Schertz, D. L. /. Soil Wat. Conserv. 38 10-14 (1983). 19. Uhland, R. E. Crop Yields Lowered by Erosion (USDA-SCS-Tech. Paper-75, USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, 1949). 20. McDaniel T. A. & Hajek, B. F. in Erosion and Soil Productivity (ed. McCool, D. K.) 48-58 (American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, 1985). 21. Busacca, A. J., McCool, D. K., Papendick, R. I. & Young, D. L. in Erosion and Soil Productivity (ed. McCool, D. K.) 152-168 (American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, 1985). 22. Young, D. L., Taylor, D. B. & Papendick, R. I. in Erosion and Soil Productivity (ed. McCool, D. K.) 130-142 (American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, 1985). 23. Miller, M. F. & Krusekopf, H. H. The Influence of Systems of Cropping and Methods of Culture on Surface Runoff and Soil Erosion (Bull. 177, Missouri Agriculture Experimental Station, Columbia, 1932). 24. Jamison, V. C., Smith, D. D. & Thornton, J. F. Soil and Water Research on a Claypan Soil (Techn. Bull. 1,379, Agricultural Research Serivce, US Dept Agriculture, US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1968). 25. Russell, E. W. Soil Conditions and Plant Growth (Longman, London, 1973). 26. Reeve, R. C. in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1 (ed. Black, C. A.) 466-476 (Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, 1965). 27. Brink, R. H. Jr, Dunbach, P. & Lynch, D. L. So// Sci 89, 157-166 (1960). 28. Metting B. & Rayburn, W. R. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 682-685 (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reganold, J., Elliott, L. & Unger, Y. Long-term effects of organic and conventional farming on soil erosion. Nature 330, 370–372 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/330370a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/330370a0
This article is cited by
-
Climate and land use changes explain variation in the A horizon and soil thickness in the United States
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Effect of Municipal Mulch and Poultry Litter Amendments on Soil and Tree Parameters of a Mature Peach Orchard in a Humid Subtropical Climate
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition (2024)
-
Effects of land use and reducing conditions of paddy fields on soil quality and high energy moisture characteristic structural stability indices in North of Iran
Paddy and Water Environment (2021)
-
Calculation of external climate costs for food highlights inadequate pricing of animal products
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Irrigation-triggered landslides in a Peruvian desert caused by modern intensive farming
Nature Geoscience (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
