Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation

Abstract

The problems of achieving mutual cooperation can be formalized in a game called the Prisoner's Dilemma in which selfish defection is always more rewarding than cooperation1. If the two protagonists have a certain minimum probability of meeting again a strategy called TIT FOR TAT is very successful2. In TIT FOR TAT the player cooperates on the first move and thereafter does whatever the opponent did on the previous move. I have studied the behaviour of fish when confronting a potential predator, because conflicts can arise within pairs of fish in these circumstances which I argue resemble a series of games of Prisoner's Dilemma. Using a system of mirrors, single three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) approaching a live predator were provided with either a simulated cooperating companion or a simulated defecting one. In both cases the test fish behaved according to TIT FOR TAT supporting the hypothesis that cooperation can evolve among egoists.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. May, R. M. Nature 292, 291–292 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trivers, R. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lombardo, M. P. Science 227, 1363–1365 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Axelrod, R. Am. pol. Sci. Rev. 75, 306–318 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Magurran, A. E., Oulton, W. J. & Pitcher, T. J. Z. Tierpsychol. 67, 167–178 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magurran, A. E. & Girling, S. L. Anim. Behav. 34, 510–518 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Magurran, A. E. & Pitcher, T. J. Proc. R. Soc. (in the press).

  9. George, C. J. W. Thesis, Harvard Univ. (1961).

  10. Pitcher, T. J., Green, D. A. & Magurran, A. E. J. Fish Biol. 28, 439–448 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pitcher, T. J. in The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes (ed. Pitcher, T. J.) 294–337 (Croom Helm, London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huntingford, F. A. Anim. Behav. 24, 245–260 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Milinski, M. Behaviour 93, 203–216 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bossema, I. & Benus, R. F. Behav. ecol. Sociobiol. 16, 99–104 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Regelmann, K. & Curio, E. Behaviour 97, 10–36 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 31, 295–311 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wotton, R. J. The Biology of the Sticklebacks (Academic, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Milinski, M. & Heller, R. Nature 275, 642–644 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huntingford, F. A. Anim. Behav. 30, 909–916 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magurran, A. E. Behav. ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 267–273 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magurran, A. E. in The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes (ed. Pitcher, T. J.) 338–365 (Croom Helm, London, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohguchi, O. Prey Density and Selection against Oddity by Three-spined Sticklebacks (Parey, Berlin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milinski, M. TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325, 433–435 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/325433a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/325433a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing