Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Monday 22 May 2017
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 325, 249 - 251 (15 January 1987); doi:10.1038/325249a0

Left hemisphere advantage in the mouse brain for recognizing ultrasonic communication calls

G. Ehret

Fakultät für Biologic, Universität Konstanz, Postfach 5560, D-7750 Konstanz, FRG

In humans, sound perceived as speech is processed preferentially by the right ear and the left hemisphere of the brain1–3. Among animals, such an advantage of one hemisphere (lateralization) in processing communication sound from other members of the species has so far been demonstrated only in macaque monkeys4–6. I report here that in the house mouse, which has a very much less elaborate forebrain than man or macaque monkey, the ultrasonic calls that are emitted by young mice to evoke maternal caring behaviour are preferentially recognized by the left hemisphere. In females with no experience of pups, which have been trained to respond to the same ultrasonic calls by conditioning, no advantage for one hemisphere is detected. The results suggest that lateralization of this function evolved early in mammals and emphasize that an innate predisposition for perceiving communication sounds is connected with a left-hemisphere advantage in processing them. This experimental system is a readily-available animal model for studying lateralized auditory brain functions.

------------------

References

1. Cutting, J. E. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 601−612 (1974).
2. Bradshaw, J. L. & Nettleton, N. C. Behav. Brain Sci. 4, 51−91 (1981).
3. Geschwind, N. & Galaburda, A. M. Archs Neurol. 42, 428−459 (1985). | ChemPort |
4. Petersen, M. R., Beecher, M. D., Zoloth, S. R., Moody, D. B. & Stebbins, W. C. Science 202, 324−327 (1978). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
5. Petersen, M. R. et al. Behav. Neurosci. 98, 779−790 (1984). | PubMed | ChemPort |
6. Heffner, H. E. & Heffner, R. S. Science 226, 75−76 (1984). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
7. Haack, B., Markl, H. & Ehret, G. in The Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse (ed. Willott, J. F.) 57−97 (Thomas, Springfield, 1983).
8. Ehret, G. & Haack, B. J. comp. Physiol. 148, 245−251 (1982). | Article |
9. Ehret, G. & Haack, B. Naturwissenschaften 68, 208 (1981). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
10. Ehret, G. in Categorical Perception (ed. Harnad, S.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in the press).
11. Koch, M. thesis, Univ. Konstanz (1986).
12. Denenberg, V. H. Behav. Brain Sci. 4, 1−49 (1981). | ISI |



© 1987 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy