Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

X-ray diffraction evidence that actin is a 100 Å filament

Abstract

The shape of the actin monomer has been determined by X-ray crystallography1 and image analysis2 to be a prolate ellipsoid consisting of two domains. A key structural question is how this monomer is assembled into the biologically important actin filament. Two completely different classes of models of F-actin have recently appeared. In one, the long axis of the monomer is oriented parallel to the filament axis1,2, while in the other it is nearly perpendicular to that axis3–5. Fowler and Aebi6 have argued that a proper assessment of the diameter of the actin filament can distinguish between the correctness of these models, since the ‘perpendicular’ model is about 95 Å in diameter, while the ‘parallel’ model is about 75 Å in diameter. Using electron microscopy, they have determined the diameter to be between 70 and 80 Å, consistent with their model. Egelman and DeRosier3 also provided evidence from electron microscopy that the filament was about 95 Å, consistent with their perpendicular model. However, all specimens prepared for electron microscopy are susceptible to various artefacts induced by the preparation procedure. X-ray diffraction of specimens in solution allows one to examine objects in their native state. Data from X-ray diffraction of actin filaments in live muscle are presented here which show that a reasonable value for the diameter of F-actin is between 95 and 100 Å.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suck, D., Kabsch, W. & Mannherz, H. G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 4319–4323 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, P. R., Fowler, W. E., Pollard, T. D. & Aebi, U. J. molec. Biol. 167, 641–660 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egelman, E. H. & DeRosier, D. J. J. molec. Biol. 116, 623–629 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, K. A. & Amos, L. A. in Actin: Its Structure and Function in Muscle and non-Muscle Cells (eds dos Remedios, C. & Barden, J.) 25–26 (Academic, Sydney, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O'Brien, E. J., Couch, J., Johnson, G. R. P. & Morris, E. P. in Actin: Its Structure and Function in Muscle and non-Muscle Cells (eds dos Remedios, C. & Barden, J.) (Academic, Sydney, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fowler, W. E. & Aebi, U. J. Cell Biol. 97, 264–269 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parry, D. A. D. & Squire, J. M. J. molec. Biol. 75, 33–55 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tajima, Y., Kamiya, K. & Seto, T. Biophys. J. 43, 335–343 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartt, J. & Mendelson, R. Fedn Proc. 39, 1728 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lednev, V. in Structural Basis and Regulation of Biological Movement [Russian] (Nauka, Moscow, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanson, J., Lednev, V., O'Brien, E. J. & Bennett, P. M. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 311–318 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Egelman, E. H. & DeRosier, D. J. in Actin: Its Structure and Function in Muscle and non-Muscle Cells (eds dos Remedios, C. & Barden, J.) 17–24> (Academic, Sydney, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tilney, L. G., Egelman, E. H., DeRosier, D. J. & Sanders, J. C. J. Cell Biol. 96, 822–834 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Egelman, E. H., Frances, N. & DeRosier, D. J. J. molec. Biol. 116, 605–622 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klug, A., Crick, F. H. C. & Wyckoff, H. W. Acta crystallogr. A 11, 199–213 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egelman, E., Padrón, R. X-ray diffraction evidence that actin is a 100 Å filament. Nature 307, 56–58 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/307056a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/307056a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing