Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Friday 21 July 2017
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 306, 686 - 688 (15 December 1983); doi:10.1038/306686a0

Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity

Clifford J. Woolf

Department of Anatomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Noxious skin stimuli which are sufficiently intense to produce tissue injury, characteristically generate prolonged post-stimulus sensory disturbances that include continuing pain, an increased sensitivity to noxious stimuli and pain following innocuous stimuli. This could result from either a reduction in the thresholds of skin nociceptors (sensitization)1,2 or an increase in the excitability of the central nervous system so that normal inputs now evoke exaggerated responses3,4. Because sensitization of peripheral receptors occurs following injury5–7, a peripheral mechanism is widely held to be responsible for post-injury hypersensitivity. To investigate this I have now developed an animal model where changes occur in the threshold and responsiveness of the flexor reflex following peripheral injury that are analogous to the sensory changes found in man. Electrophysiological analysis of the injury-induced increase in excitability of the flexion reflex shows that it in part arises from changes in the activity of the spinal cord. The long-term consequences of noxious stimuli result, therefore, from central as well as from peripheral changes.

------------------

References

1. Perl, E. R. in Advances in Research and Therapy, Vol. 1, 17−28 (Raven, New York, 1970).
2. Lewis, T. Pain (Macmillan, London, 1942).
3. Sturge, W. A. Brain 5, 494−510 (1883).
4. Hardy, J. D., Wolff, H. G. & Goodell, H. J. clin. Invest. 29, 115−146 (1950). | ISI |
5. Perl, E. R., Kumuzawa, T., Lynn, B. & Kenins, P. Prog. Brain Res. 43, 236−276 (1976).
6. Fitzgerald, M. J. Physiol. Lond. 297, 207−216 (1979). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
7. LaMotte, R. H., Thalhammer, J. G., Törebjork, H. & Robinson, C. J. J. Neurosci. 2, 765−781 (1982). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
8. Woods, J. W. J. Neurophysiol. 27, 635−641 (1964). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
9. Swett, J. & Woolf, C. J. J. Physiol. Lond. 341, 20P−21P (1983).
10. Lynn, B. & Carpenter, S. E. Brain Res. 287, 493−508 (1982).
11. Fleischer, E., Handwerker, H. O. & Joukhadar, S. Brain Res. 267, 81−92 (1983). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1983 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy