Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Sunday 12 July 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 302, 415 - 417 (31 March 1983); doi:10.1038/302415a0

Short-range order of crystallin proteins accounts for eye lens transparency

Mireille Delaye* & Annette Tardieu

*Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Bat. 510, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France
Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, CNRS, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

In its normal state, the eye lens is transparent despite the presence in the cell cytoplasm of high concentrations of proteins, the crystalline, which, a priori, could be expected to scatter an important part of the incident light. Early on, an explanation was sought in the spatial correlations between individual scatterers. Trokel1 first proposed that the "high concentration of proteins in the lens must be accompanied by a degree of local order approaching a paracrystalline state"; Benedek2 subsequently suggested that a dense, noncrystalline packing of the proteins would sufficiently reduce the scattered intensity. However, in spite of an improved understanding of the molecular structure of crystallins3−6, their spatial order remained unknown. We present here a small-angle X-ray scattering study of the problem, performed with calf lens cytoplasm both in intact lenses and in cytoplasmic extracts where the crystallin concentration was varied from 3 to 510 mg ml-1. All our experimental data are consistent with short-range spatial order, as in dense liquids or glasses7−9, and this provides a simple explanation for lens transparency2,10. In addition, we detected no conformational change or reorganization of the crystallin proteins throughout the investigated concentration range.

------------------

References
1. Trokel, S. Invest. Ophthal. 1, 493−501 (1962). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
2. Benedek, G. B. Appl. Opt. 10, 459−473 (1971). | ISI |
3. Siezen, R. J., Bindels, J. G. & Hoenders, H. J. Eur. J. Biochem. 111, 435−444 (1980). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
4. Andries, C. et al. Expl Eye Res. 34, 239−255 (1982). | Article | ChemPort |
5. Bloemendal, H. (ed.) in Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Eye Lens, 1−47 (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981).
6. Blundell, T. et al. Nature 289, 771−777 (1981). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
7. Guinier, A. & Fournet, G. Small Angle Scattering of X-Rays (Wiley, New York, 1955).
8. Mikolaj, P. G. & Pings, C. J. J. chem. Phys. 46, 1401−1411 (1967). | ISI | ChemPort |
9. Finney, J. L. Nature 266, 309−314 (1977). | ISI | ChemPort |
10. Delaye, M. & Gromiec, A. Biopolymers (in the press).
11. Clark, J. I., Delaye, M., Hammer, P. & Mengel, L. Curr. Eye Res. 1 (12), 695−704 (1982). | ISI | ChemPort |
12. Benedetti, E. L., Dunia, I., Ramaekers, F. C. S. & Kibbelaar, M. A. in Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Eye Lens (ed. Bloemendal, H.) 137−188 (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981). | ChemPort |
13. Luzzati, V. Acta crystallogr. 13, 939−945 (1960). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
14. Luzzati, V. & Tardieu, A. A. Rev. Biophys. Bioengng 9, 1−29 (1980). | Article | ChemPort |
15. Siezen, R. J. & Berger, H. Eur. J. Biochem. 91, 397−405 (1978). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
16. Bindels, J. G. thesis, Nijmegen Univ. (1982).
17. Zinke, M., Damaschun, G., Muller, J. J. & Ruckpaul, K. Studia biophys. berl. 71, 135−136 (1978). | ChemPort |
18. Thiele, E. J. chem. Phys. 39, 474−479 (1963). | ISI |
19. Carnahan, N. F. & Starling, K. E. J. chem. Phys. 51, 635−636 (1969). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
20. Gabriel, A. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 48, 1303−1305 (1977). | Article | ISI |
21. Sardet, C., Tardieu, A. & Luzzati, V. J. molec. Biol. 105, 383−407 (1976). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
22. Eisenberg, H. Biological Macromolecules and Polyelectrolytes in Solution (Clarendon, Oxford, 1976).



© 1983 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy