Abstract
Thecodontians have long been recognized as the basal stock from which all other archosaurs were derived, but their phylogeny and classification are very confused, and the origin and evolution of archosaurs are consequently still poorly understood. The skull and skeletal morphology of thecodontians is confusingly uniform, and many palaeontologists feel that the ankle joint may provide a more useful clue to the phylogeny and classification of these groups1,2. I attempt here to trace some of the thecodontian lineages on the basis of tarsal anatomy. The major structural changes from thecodontian to dinosaurs are most clearly visible in the pelvis and hind-limbs, associated with improvement of gait from the ‘sprawler’ through the ‘semi-improved’ to the ‘fully-improved’ condition3,4. As a result, the function of the ankle joint was modified from a simple flexible base for the leg to the more advanced role of a lever. For this reason, an understanding of thecodontian tarsi is necessary if we are to understand the evolution of the later archosaurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cruickshank, A. R. I. S. Afr. J. Sci. 75, 168 (1979).
Thulborn, R. A. Alcheringa 4, 241 (1980).
Charig, A. J. in Studies in Vertebrate Evolution (eds Joysey, K. A. & Kemp, T. S.) 708 (Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 1972).
Bakker, R. T. Evolution 25, 363 (1971).
Bonaparte, J. F. Op. lilloana 22, 1 (1971).
Romer, A. S. Breviora 395, 1 (1972).
Charig, A. S. in Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie Vol. 13 (ed. Kuhn, O.) 7 (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 1976).
Carroll, R. L. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 72, 37 (1976).
Cruickshank, A. R. I. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 62(2), 161 (1978).
Schaeffer, B. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 78, 395 (1941).
Walker, A. D. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B248, 53 (1964).
Krebs, B. Schweiz. palaeont. Abh. 81, 1 (1965).
Sill, W. D. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harvard 146, 317 (1974).
Sawin, H. J. J. Paleont. 21, 201 (1947).
Walker, A. D. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B244, 103 (1961).
Chatterjee, S. Palaeontology 21, 83 (1978).
Walker, A. D. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B257, 323 (1970).
Bonaparte, J. F. Acta geol. lilloana 13, 5 (1975).
Bonaparte, J. F. J. Paleont. 50, 808 (1976).
Madsen, J. H. Jr Utah geol. min. Surv. 109, 1 (1976).
Lambe, L. M. Mem. geol. Surv. Can. 100, 1 (1917).
Charig, A. S. Linn. Soc. Lond. Symp. Ser. 3, 65 (1976).
Bakker, R. T. & Galton, P. M. Nature 248, 168 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chatterjee, S. Phylogeny and classification of thecodontian reptiles. Nature 295, 317–320 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/295317a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/295317a0
This article is cited by
-
New embryological and palaeontological evidence sheds light on the evolution of the archosauromorph ankle
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence dates
Journal of Molecular Evolution (1990)
-
Joints of the crocodile-reversed archosaurs
Nature (1988)
-
Joints of the crocodile-reversed archosaurs
Nature (1988)
-
Archosaur ankles and the relationships of the thecodontian and dinosaurian reptiles
Nature (1985)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.