Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Saturday 11 July 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 294, 178 - 180 (12 November 1981); doi:10.1038/294178a0

Point mutation in the TATA box curtails expression of sea urchin H2A histone gene in vivo

R. Grosschedl*, B. Wasylyk, P. Chambon & M. L. Birnstiel*‡

*Institut für Molekularbiologie II der Universität Zürich, Hönggerberg, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire des Eucaryotes du CNRS, Unité 84 de Biologie Moléculaire et de Génie Génétique de L'INSERM, Institut de Chimie Biologique, Strasbourg, France
To whom correspondence should be addressed.

In most, but not all, eukaryotic genes transcribed by polymerase B (II)1–5, the site of initiation of transcription is preceded by a TATAA TAA T sequence4, commonly referred to as the Goldberg–Hogness6 or TATA box, which seems to be required for the generation of faithful 5' termini of mRNAs7–14. For all genes except one9,12,15–17, deletion of the TATA box reduces the rate of mRNA synthesis7,10,11,13,18–23. Point mutations in the TATA box of the chick conalbumin gene diminish transcription in vitro 20–40-fold21,24. The question remained of whether this effect would persist in vivo where far upstream sequences dramatically modulate gene expression7–11,25,26. Unfortunately the chicken conalbumin gene is poorly expressed when introduced into eukaryotic cells in culture (B.W., unpublished results) or into Xenopus oocytes (S. Swany, personal communication). We have therefore constructed a new gene unit with a chimaeric promoter region by introducing the conalbumin wild-type or mutated TATA box region into the sea urchin H2A histone gene, which is known to be efficiently expressed in Xenopus oocytes27–29. We report here that with both the wild-type and mutated chimaeric promoters, initiation of transcription occurs at a novel initiation site about 26 nucleotides downstream from the TATA or TAGA boxes, but in the mutant case, the amount of specific transcripts is decreased fivefold.

------------------

References
1. Ziff, E. B. & Evans, R. M. Cell 15, 1463−1475 (1978). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
2. Gannon, F. et al. Nature 278, 428−434 (1979). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
3. Busslinger, M., Portmann, R., Irminger, J. C. & Birnstiel, M. L. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 957−977 (1980). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
4. Breathnach, R. & Chambon, P. A. Rev. Biochem. 50, 349−384 (1981). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
5. Hentschel, Ch. & Birnstiel, M. L. Cell 25, 301−313 (1981). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
6. Goldberg, M. thesis, Stanford Univ. (1979).
7. Grosschedl, R. & Birnstiel, M. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 1432−1436 (1980). | ChemPort |
8. Grosschedl, R. & Birnstiel, M. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7102−7106 (1980). | ChemPort |
9. Benoist, Ch. & Chambon, P. Nature 290, 304−310 (1981). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
10. Faye, G., Leung, D. W., Tatchell, K., Hall, B. D. & Smith, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 2258−2268 (1981). | ChemPort |
11. Dierks, P., van Ooyen, A., Mantei, N. & Weissmann, C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 1411−1415 (1981). | ChemPort |
12. Mathis, D. J. & Chambon, P. Nature 290, 310−315 (1981). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
13. Corden, J. et al. Science 209, 1406−1414 (1980). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
14. Sassone-Corsi, P., Corden, J., Kedinger, C. & Chambon, P. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 3941−3958 (1981). | PubMed | ChemPort |
15. Gluzman, Y., Sambrook, J. F. & Frisque, R. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3898−3902 (1980). | ChemPort |
16. Benoist, C. & Chambon, P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3865−3869 (1980). | ChemPort |
17. Ghosh, P. K., Lebowitz, P., Frisque, R. J. & Gluzman, Y. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 100−104 (1981). | ChemPort |
18. Wasylyk, B., Kedinger, C., Corden, J., Brison, O. & Chambon, P. Nature 285, 267−373 (1980). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
19. Hu, S. L. & Manley, J. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 820−824 (1981). | ChemPort |
20. Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M. J. & O'Malley, B. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 879−883 (1981). | ChemPort |
21. Wasylyk, B. & Chambon, P. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 1813−1824 (1981). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
22. McKnight, S. & Gavis, E. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 5931−5948 (1980). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
23. Osborne, T. F., Schell, R. E., Burch-Jaffe, E., Berget, S. J. & Berk, A. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 1381−1385 (1981). | ChemPort |
24. Wasylyk, B. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 7024−7028 (1980). | ChemPort |
25. Gruss, P., Dhar, R. & Khoury, G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 943−947 (1981). | ChemPort |
26. Guarente, L. & Ptashne, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 2199−2203 (1981). | ChemPort |
27. Kressmann, A., Clarkson, S. G., Telford, J. L. & Birnstiel, M. L. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 42, 1077−1082 (1977). | ISI |
28. Probst, E., Kressmann, A. & Birnstiel, M. L. J. molec. Biol. 135, 700−732 (1979).
29. Hentschel, Ch., Probst, E. & Birnstiel, M. L. Nature 288, 100−102 (1980). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
30. Cochet, M. et al. Nature 282, 567−574 (1979). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
31. Schaffner, W. et al. Cell 4, 655−671 (1978). | Article |
32. Maxam, A. M. & Gilbert, W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 560−564 (1977). | ChemPort |
33. Kressmann, A. & Birnstiel, M. L. NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. 31, 383−407 (1980).
34. Gross, K., Probst, E., Schaffner, W. & Birnstiel, M. L. Cell 8, 455−469 (1976). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
35. Weaver, R. F. & Weissmann, C. Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1175−1193 (1979). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
36. Green, M. R. & Roeder, R. G. Cell 22, 231−242 (1980). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
37. Baker, C. C., Herisse, G., Courtois, G., Galibert, F. & Ziff, E. Cell 18, 569−580 (1979). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1981 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy