Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evolution of the inclination of Phobos

Abstract

Two mutually exclusive hypotheses concerning the origin of the martian satellites have commonly been proposed: (1) they were formed in the vicinity of Mars, on orbits not very different from their present orbits, or (2) they originated far from Mars and were somehow captured1–3. Hypothesis (1) had been favoured because the satellites' orbits are nearly circular and equatorial. More recent Viking results imply that the satellites are composed of carbonaceous material4,5, suggesting an asteroidal origin. We show here that the satellites have remained close to their laplacian plane throughout their orbital evolution. Thus Phobos and Deimos need not have originated near the martian equator as previously believed3, but could have been captured in Mars' orbital plane instead, and later evolved to their present inclinations. This new result seems to make hypothesis (2) more plausible.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunten, D. H. Icarus 37, 113–123 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollack, J. B., Burns, J. A. & Tauber, M. E. Icarus 37, 587–611 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambeck, K. J. geophys. Res. 84, 5651–5658 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veverka, J. Vistas Astr. 22, 163–192 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duxbury, T. C. & Veverka, J. Science 201, 812–814 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shor, V. A. Celest. Mech. 12, 61–75 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinclair, A. T. Vistas Astr. 22, 133–140 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns, J. A. Vistas Astr. 22, 193–210 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laplace, P. Celestial Mechanics (Reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1966).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Tisserand, F. Traité de Mecanique Celeste, Vol. II (Gauthiers-Villars, Paris, 1889).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldreich, P. Rev. Geophys. 4, 411–439 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mignard, F. Celest. Mech. 18, 287–294 (1978).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ward, W. R. J. geophys. Res. 79, 3375–3386 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cazenave, A., Dobrovolskis, A. & Lago, B. Evolution of the inclination of Phobos. Nature 284, 430–431 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/284430a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/284430a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing