Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Permian–Triassic continental reconstruction of the Gulf of Mexico–Caribbean area

Abstract

The morphology of the margins of Palaeozoic continental crust around the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea is derived from the distribution of Jurassic evaporites in the Gulf and the distribution of post-Palaeozoic arcs around the Caribbean. The Permian–Triassic position of the continental masses in this region is determined by fitting these margins together to achieve the best agreement of margin morphology and geological continuity. This model is supported by geological observations from the margins and floors of the Gulf and Caribbean and by geometrical considerations derived from continental reconstructions around the Atlantic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dewey, J. F. Am. J. Sci. 275-A, 260–284 (1975).

  2. Shurbet, D. H. & Cebull, S. E. Tectonophysics 28, T25–T30 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helwig, J. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 243–254 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, T. H. & Schmidt, V. A. EOS 59, 404 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ladd, J. W., Buffler, R. T., Watkins, J. S., Worzel, J. L. & Carranza, A. Geology 4, 365–368 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz, R. S. & Holden, J. C. J. geophys. Res. 75, 4939–3956 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeland, G. L. & Dietz, R. S. Nature 232, 20–23 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. LePichon, X. & Fox, P. J. J. geophys. Res. 76, 6294–6308 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van derVoo, R., Mauk, F. J. & French, R. B. Geology 4, 177–180 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burke, K. C. & White, G. W. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 10, 374 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walper, J. L. & Rowett, C. L. Gulf Coast Ass. geol. Soc. Trans. 22, 105–116 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. VanderVoo, R. & French, R. B. Earth. Sci. Rev. 10, 99–119 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pilger, R. H. Gulf Coast Ass. geol. Soc. Trans. 28, 385–393 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carey, S. W. in Continental Drift, 177–355 (Tasmania University, Hobart, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt, V. A. & Anderson, T. H. EOS 59, 404 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silver, L. T. & Anderson, T. H. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 6, 955 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ross, C. A. Geology 7, 41–44 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keller, G. R. & Cebull, S. E. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 83, 1659–166 (1973).

  19. Wickham, J., Roeder, D. & Briggs, G. Geology 4, 173–176 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Banks, P. O. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 181–199 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maresch, W. V. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 85, 669–682 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burke, K. C. Geology 3, 613–616 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ladd, J. W. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 87, 969–976 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz, R. S. in Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences Vol. 2 (eds Tarling, D. H. & Runcorn, S. K.) 865–871 (Academic, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sclater, J. G., Hellinger, S. & Tapscott, C. J. Geol. 85, 509–559 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bullard, E. C., Everett, J. E. & Smith, A. G. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A258, 41–51 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin, R. G. & Case, J. E. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 65–101 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Antoine, J. W., Martin, R., Pyle, T. & Bryant, W. R. in The Geology of Continental Margins (eds Burk, C. A. & Drake C. L.) 683–693 (Springer, New York, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. King, P. B. Tectonic Map of North America 1:5,000,000 (United States Geol. Survey, 1969).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Watkins, J. S. et al. in Framework, Facies and Oil-Trapping Characteristics of the Upper Continental Margin (eds Bouma, A. H., Moore, G. T. & Coleman, J. M.) 43–65 (Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Studies in Geology, 7, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perfit, M. R. & Heezen, B. C. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 89, 1155–1174 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Humphris, C. C. in Framework, Facies and Oil-Trapping Characteristics of the Upper Continental Margin (eds Bouma, A. H., Moore, G. T. & Coleman, J. M.) 69–85 (Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Studies in Geology, 7, 1978).

  33. Gose, W. A. & Swartz, D. K. Geology 5, 505–508 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Berange, J. P. & Dearnly, R. Geol. Rdsch. 64, 883–899 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lopez-Ramos, E. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds. Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 201–241 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  36. King, P. B. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 201–241 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dillon, W. P. & Vedder, J. G. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 84, 2713–2732 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, G. Permian–Triassic continental reconstruction of the Gulf of Mexico–Caribbean area. Nature 283, 823–826 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283823a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283823a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing