Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differential solar rotation depends on solar activity

Abstract

SUNSPOTS have long been used as tracers to determine the rotation rate of the Sun. Scheiner1 noted 250 years ago that low-latitude sunspots rotate more rapidly than those at high latitude (‘differential rotation’). In a recent review, Howard2 stressed the limitations of the sunspot technique for determining rotation rate and differential rotation, as long-lived spots may have substantial individual motions, random and systematic, in both longitude and latitude. For example, leading and following spots of a sunspot group diverge early in the group's lifetime3; rotation rates for isolated (‘unipolar’) spots and groups differ, with group rates depending on the shape of the group4. Another problem in using sunspots is the Wilson effect, a surface depression of the spot causing errors in longitude estimates away from the central meridian. Despite these difficulties, spots have been used previously to establish that there is no secular variation in rotation rate and differential rotation, nor any variations with phase of the solar cycle5, the only possible exception being during long-term disruptions in the solar activity cycle mechanism6. We present here evidence to suggest that the first of these conclusions is incorrect, and that differential rotation does depend on the amplitude of the solar cycle, at least for unipolar spots.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scheiner, C. Rosa ursina sive sol (Andreas Phaeus, Braccuabi, Italy, 1630).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howard, R. Rev. Geophys Space Phys. 16, 721 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mon Not. R. astr. Soc. 85, 553 (1925).

  4. Ward, F. Astrophys. J. 145, 416 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Newton, H. W. & Nunn, M. L. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 111, 413 (1951).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eddy, J. A., Gilman, P. A. & Trotter, D. E. Solar Phys. 46, 3 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 85, 548 (1925).

  8. Newton, H. W. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 95, 60 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrington, R. C. Observations of the Spots on the Sun (Williams and Norgate, London, 1863).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gillman, P. A. in Basic Mechanisms of Solar Activity, IAU Symp 71 (eds Bumba, V. & Kleczek, J.), 207 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Wöhl, H. Astr. Astrophys. 62, 165 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CLARK, D., YALLOP, B., RICHARD, S. et al. Differential solar rotation depends on solar activity. Nature 280, 299–300 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280299a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280299a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing