Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The Bucegi Conglomerate: a Romanian Carpathian submarine slope deposit

Abstract

THE Bucegi Conglomerate, a thick conglomerate-sandstone unit of Albian age (Cretaceous), is well exposed in the Eastern Carpathian Chain near Sinaia, Romania. This unit occupies more than 5,000 km2 in the vicinity of the change in structural–stratigraphic trend of the mobile belt from E–W to N–S (Fig. 1a). The thickness of this remarkably coarse series is regionally variable and locally exceeds 2,000 m. To the west the conglomerate overlies, with angular unconformity, Middle and Upper Jurassic platform carbonate rocks which in turn unconformably overlie crystalline basement. To the east, over a distance of approximately 10 km, the Bucegi rests with local unconformity on Neocomian and Barremian–Aptian flysch several kilometres thick (Fig. 1b and c). This unconformity post-dates pre-upper Aptian to post-lower Aptian folding 1,2. Previous work has alluded to the shallow marine and nearshore origin3 of this formation, and it has been frequently referred to as a molasse, or para-molasse4, mainly due to its coarse nature, its pebble shape3,5, its stratigraphic position above sandstone-shale turbidite-rich formations, and presumably also to its ‘post-tectonic’ position within the mobile belt. Here we consider an alternative, that is that the Bucegi Conglomerate accumulated in an infra-neritic to deep marine environment and that it records progradation of coarse material directly onto the slope and base of slope of a turbidite basin. The field observations we made in conjunction with Romanian colleagues in selected sections of the Sinaia region (Jepi Valley, Chindichiu road cuts) and an evaluation of previous reports provide a plausible basis to reconsider the depositional origin of the Bucegi.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Patrulius, D., Dimitrescu, R. & Gherasi, N. Carte Géologique 28. Brasov (Institut Géologique, Bucarest, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burchfiel, B. C. & Bleahu, M. Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Pap. 158, 1–82 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mihailescu, N., Panin, N., Jipa, D. & Contescu, L. Geol. Studies Res. Romanian Acad. Sci. 12, 231–236 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Contescu, L. R. Geol. Rdsch. 56, 241–262 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mihailescu, N. Acta geol. Acad. Scient. Hungaricae 15, 197–205 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Contescu, L. R. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 58, 2436–2476 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patrulius, D., Stefanescu, M., Popa, E. & Popescu, I. Guide to Excursion 50AC, Romania (Int. Geol. Cong. Prague, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hampton, M. A. J. Sed. Petrol. 45, 834–844 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chamberlain, T. K. Papers in Maring Geology (ed. Miller, R. L.) 42–64 (Macmillan, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stanley, D. J. Mar. Geol 16, M1–M8 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies, I. C. & Walker, R. G. J. Sed. Petrol. 44, 1200–1216 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, R. G. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86, 737–784 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Winn, Jr, R. D. & Dott, Jr, R. H. Geology 5, 41–44 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter, R. M. & Norris, R. J. Sediment. Geol. 18, 289–319 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Middleton, G. V. & Hampton, M. A. Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management (eds Stanley, D. J. & Swift, D. J. P.) 197–218 (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stanley, D. J. & Unrug, R. Recognition of Ancient Sedimentary Environments (eds Rigby, J. K. & Hamblin, W. K.) 287–340 (Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. Sp. Publ. 16, Tulsa, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Marschalko, R. Carpathian Balkan Geol. Assoc. Proc. 10th Congr. 113–122 (1973).

  18. Hendry, H. E. Sedimentology 18, 277–292 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricci Lucchi, F. Giorn. Geol., Ann. Museo Geol. Bologna 36, 1–47 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shideler, G. L. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 54, 789–806 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott, K. M. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 50, 72–107 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher, R. V. J. Sed. Petrol. 41, 916–927 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lowe, D. R. J. Sed. Petrol. 42, 89–101 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shepard, F. P. & Dill, R. F. Submarine Canyons and Other Sea Valleys (Rand McNally, Chicago, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Embley, R. W. Geology 4, 371–374 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Griggs, G. B., Kulm, L. D., Waters, A. C. & Fowler, G. A. J. Geol. 78, 611–619 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STANLEY, D., HALL, B. The Bucegi Conglomerate: a Romanian Carpathian submarine slope deposit. Nature 276, 60–64 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/276060a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/276060a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing