Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Claims and accomplishments of applied catastrophe theory

Abstract

Several representative attempts to apply catastrophe theory to biological and social science problems turn out on close analysis to be characterised by incorrect reasoning, far-fetched assumptions, erroneous consequences, and exaggerated claims. Catastrophe theory seems to have made no significant contributions to biology and the social sciences, and to have no advantage over other better-established mathematical tools which have been used to better effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart, I. N. in Encyclopedia Britannica Book of the Year (Encyclopedia Britannica, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sussman, H. J. & Zahler, R. S. Synthese (in the press).

  3. Kozak, J. J. & Benham, C. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 71, 1977 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeeman, E. C. Sci. Amer. 234, 65 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeeman, E. C., in Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 7, 69 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zeeman, E. C. in Towards A Theoretical Biology 4, 8 (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kline, M. Mathematics in Western Culture (Oxford University Press, New York, 1974).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, D. D. The Application of Catastrophe Theory to Ecological Systems (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloss Laxenburg, Austria, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 117, 500 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crelin, E. S. J. exp. Zool. 120, 547 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsdale, T., Pearson, M. & Whitehead, M., J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 35, 625 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Woodcock, A. E. R. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 231, 60 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dodson, M. M. Math. Biosci. 28, 243 (1976).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Isnard, C. A., Zeeman, E. C., in Use of Models in The Social Sciences (Tavistock, London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blainey, G. The Causes of War (Macmillan, New York, 1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolata, G. Science 196, 287 (1977).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeeman, E. C., et al. Br. J. math. stat. Psych. 29, 73 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahler, R., Sussmann, H. Claims and accomplishments of applied catastrophe theory. Nature 269, 759–763 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269759a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269759a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing