Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Monday 23 November 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 266, 514 - 515 (07 April 1977); doi:10.1038/266514b0

Tidal acceleration of the moon deduced from observations of artificial satellites

C. C. GOAD & B. C. DOUGLAS

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey, Geodetic Research and Development Laboratory, Rockville, Maryland 20852

DOUGLAS et al. 1 demonstrated the existence of an apparent latitude dependence of tidal friction by determining disparate values of the second degree Love number (k 2) from perturbations of the inclinations of the GEOS-1 and GEOS-2 satellites. Lambeck et al. 2 correctly explained this phenomenon as being due to neglect of ocean tide perturbations. Parameter values for some ocean tide components have been obtained from several satellites3, but parameter values for the M 2 tide, the dominant (85%) effect of the oceans on the tidal acceleration of the Moon, have not been published. Using an improved method for computing mean elements, we4 obtained an observation equation for the M 2 tide from the satellite 1967-92A. Applying this technique to the satellite GEOS-3, we now obtain an additional observation equation for the M 2 tide. As shown in ref. 2, solid and fluid tide effects on satellites cannot be separated, requiring assumption of the solid tide amplitude and phase parameters for a fluid tide solution. Assuming k 2 = 0.30, delta2 = 0°, and using the values of Lambeck5 for the minor O 1 and N 2, contributions to ndot t, our fluid tide parameters for the M 2 ocean tide yield the value of the tidal acceleration ndot t = -27.4plusminus3 arc s (100 yr)-2, in excellent agreement with the value ndot t = -27.2plusminus1.7 arc s (100 yr)-2 obtained by Muller6 from a combination of ancient and modern observations. These two values are lower than the value ndot t = -35plusminus4 arc s (100 yr)-2 obtained from numerical ocean tide models5. Our assumption of a negligible solid tide phase angle is supported by a recent determination by J. T. Kuo (personal communication) that the phase angle obtained from a transcontinental network of tidal gravimetric stations is < 1°. Changes 0.5° in solid tide phase angle change our result for the combined solid/fluid ndot t by no more than 1 arc s per (100 yr) (ref. 2).

------------------

References
1. Douglas, B. C., Klosko, S. M., Marsh, J. G. & Williamson, R. G. Celestial Mechanics 10, 165–168 (1974).
2. Lambeck, K., Cazenave, A. & Balmino, G., Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 12, 421–434 (1974).
3. Felsentreger, T. L., Marsh, J. G. & Agreen, R. W. J. geophys. Res. 81, 2557–2563 (1976).
4. Goad, C. C. & Douglas, B. C. J. geophys. Res. 82, 898–900 (1977).
5. Lambeck, K. J. geophys. Res. 80, 2917–2925 (1975).
6. Muller, P. M., Jet Propulsion Laboratory Special Rep. JPL SP 43-36 (1976)



© 1977 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy