| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tidal acceleration of the moon deduced from observations of artificial satellites C. C. GOAD & B. C. DOUGLAS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey, Geodetic Research and Development Laboratory, Rockville, Maryland 20852 DOUGLAS et al.
1 demonstrated the existence of an apparent latitude dependence of tidal friction by determining disparate values of the second degree Love number (k
2) from perturbations of the inclinations of the GEOS-1 and GEOS-2 satellites. Lambeck et al.
2 correctly explained this phenomenon as being due to neglect of ocean tide perturbations. Parameter values for some ocean tide components have been obtained from several satellites3, but parameter values for the M
2 tide, the dominant (85%) effect of the oceans on the tidal acceleration of the Moon, have not been published. Using an improved method for computing mean elements, we4 obtained an observation equation for the M
2 tide from the satellite 1967-92A. Applying this technique to the satellite GEOS-3, we now obtain an additional observation equation for the M
2 tide. As shown in ref. 2, solid and fluid tide effects on satellites cannot be separated, requiring assumption of the solid tide amplitude and phase parameters for a fluid tide solution. Assuming k
2 = 0.30,
© 1977 Nature Publishing Group Privacy Policy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||