Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Population density affecting adult shell size of snail Cepaea nemoralis L.

Abstract

THOMAS et al.1,2 have questioned the ability of molluscs to limit their population size by self inhibition at high densities. They suggest that plant metabolites may have caused the reduction in growth and fecundity of the aquatic snail Biomphalaria glabrata Say ascribed to crowding in previous studies3,4. Field evidence for density-dependent regulation is limited. Yom-Tov5 found that the fecundity of the desert snail Trochoidea seetzeni Pfeiffer was adversely affected by population density; he considered that either self-inhibition or nutritional differences were responsible. While studying the population dynamics and energetics of the land snail Cepaea nemoralis L., we have found evidence for density-dependent effects that cannot readily be explained by resource limitation. In samples of C. nemoralis collected in 1968 to study shell polymorphism (M. A. Palles-Clark, unpublished) a negative correlation was noticed between adult shell diameter and sample size (r =−0.60, P <0.001). Snails were collected from chalk grassland between Beacon Hill and Round Down, West Sussex. A more detailed study carried out in the same area during the summer of 1973 confirmed this effect. The density of adult C. nemoralis was measured by mark-recapture at nine 20 × 20 m sites, situated 100–600 m apart. Each site was sampled in May, June and August. As there were insufficient recaptures to use multiple recapture methods for all sites, adult population densities were estimated for the second sampling occasion using the Lincoln index.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas, J. D., in Advances in Parasitology, 11 (edit. by Dawes, B.), 307–394 (Academic, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas, J. D., Goldsworthy, G. J., and Aram, R. H., J. anim. Ecol., 44, 1–27 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berrie, A. D., and Visser, S. A., Physiol. Zool, 36, 167–173 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levy, M. G., Tunis, M., and Isseroff, H., Nature, 241, 65–66 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yom-Tov, Y., J. anim. Ecol., 41, 17–22 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williamson, P., J. anim. Ecol. (in the press).

  7. Wolda, H., Arch. Neerl. Zool., 15, 381–471 (1963); Evolution, 21, 117–129 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook, L. M., and O'Donald, P., in Ecological Genetics and Evolution (edit. by Creed, R.), 93–108 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1971).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolda, H., J. anim. Ecol., 38, 305–327 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Williamson, P., thesis, Portsmouth Polytechnic (1975).

  11. Wolda, H., Israel J. Malacol., 3, 63–71 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMSON, P., CAMERON, R. & CARTER, M. Population density affecting adult shell size of snail Cepaea nemoralis L.. Nature 263, 496–497 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/263496b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/263496b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing