| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reliability of amino acid racemisation dating and palaeotemperature analysis on bones MICHAEL L. BENDER Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881 THE general inability of isotope geologists to work out techniques for dating continental Pleistocene deposits has led to the conception of nonisotopic chemical methods. Hare and Mitterer1 noted that fossils could possibly be dated by determining the extent to which the l optical isomer of a given amino acid had racemised to form the d isomer which is initially absent in skeletal material. Obviously, the rate constant for the reaction must be known accurately if age is to be calculated, but its value is difficult to assess: it is highly temperature dependent2 (about 20%° C-1); it depends on the state of the amino acids (free amino acids racemise about an order of magnitude more rapidly than those bound as peptites)3−5; and it is highly dependent on environment6. Furthermore, free amino acids may back react to produce the bound forms, and there could be open system conditions during diagenesis2.
© 1974 Nature Publishing Group Privacy Policy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||