Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Discontinuous Change in Earth's Spin Rate following Great Solar Storm of August 1972

Abstract

THE question of a link between changes in the Earth's spin rate and the activity of the Sun is of topical interest, and there is good evidence that the changing length of day is influenced by the mean level of solar activity1,2. The possibility of a one-to-one correlation between specific events on the Sun and specific changes in the length of day has remained more controversial, however, although there was a suggestion of such an effect associated with the great solar storm of 1959 (refs. 3–5) Specifically, Danjon suggested3–5 that there was an increase in the length of day when the nucleonic component of solar cosmic rays increased ; this was in addition to the usual steady increase in the length of day. Other observers questioned the reality of this effect (for a discussion of the controversy see ref. 6), and because the 1959 solar storm was the greatest recorded since the time of Galileo, there was no immediate hope of an independent test of Danjon's claim. In August 1972, however, an even greater disturbance occurred on the Sun7–9. It seemed to us that this might provide the ideal opportunity to resolve the controversy, and we have indeed found a discontinuous change in the length of day, and a change in the rate of change of the length of day (a glitch) immediately after that event. Changes in the length of day, and thus in the spin rate of the Earth, are revealed by regular measurements of Universal Time (UT) carried out at many observatories around the world. For our purpose, we are interested in UT2, the version of Universal Time with the effects of the Chandler Wobble and seasonal variations removed. The difference between Atomic Time (AT) and UT2 shows, on average, a monotonic increase as the Earth's spin slows down and the length of day increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Challinor, R. A., Science, 172, 1022 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gribbin, J., Science, 173, 558 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Danjon, A., CR Acad. Sci. Paris., 254, 2479 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danjon, A., CR Acad. Sci. Paris., 254, 3058 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Danjon, A., Notes et Informations de l'Observatoire de Paris, 8 No. 7 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schatzman, E., in The Earth–Moon System (edit. by Cameron A. G. W., and Marsden, B. G.), 12 (Plenum, New York, 1966).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pomerantz, M. A., and Duggal, S. P., Nature, 241, 331 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chupp, E. L., Forrest, D. J., Higbie, P. R., Surie, A. N., Tsai, C., and Dunphy, P. P., Nature, 241, 333 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathews, T., and Lanzerotti, L. J., Nature, 241, 335 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Macdonald, N. J., and Roberts, W. O., J. Geophys. Res., 65 529 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts, W. O., and Olsen, R. M., J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 135 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GRIBBIN, J., PLAGEMANN, S. Discontinuous Change in Earth's Spin Rate following Great Solar Storm of August 1972. Nature 243, 26–27 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/243026a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/243026a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing