Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Frequency Response of Bat Tympanic Membrane

Abstract

VESPERTILIONID bats produce FM echolocation pulses which sweep through a broad ultrasonic range1,2. Neurophysiological3,4 and behavioural5 evidence indicates that Myotis lucifugus, the most intensively studied of the vespertilionids, is maximally sensitive to the frequencies of its cries. The small size and mass of the middle ear structures in Microchiroptera6 suggest that the transduction system is specialized for the reception of ultrasound. It is obvious that the bat middle ear must respond to high ultrasonic frequencies, but it is not known how efficient the middle ear is, or whether this is achieved by tuned resonances or by a broad-band response. We have used the Mössbauer technique to investigate the contribution of the tympanic membrane to this high-frequency sensitivity. Although our primary interest was in the high-frequency response, we examined a broad range from 1 to 100 kHz.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henson, O. W., in The Biology of Bats (edit. by Wimsatt, W. A.) (Academic Press, London and New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friend, J. H., Suga, N., and Suthers, R. A., J. Cell. Physiol., 67, 319 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grinnell, A. D., J. Physiol., 167, 38 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suga, N., J. Physiol., 172, 449 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dallan, J. I., Science, 150, 1185 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henson, O. W., Univ. Kansas. Sci. Bull., 42, 151 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnstone, B. M., and Boyle, A. J. F., Science, 158, 389 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnstone, B. M., Taylor, K. J.,and Boyle, A. J. F., J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 47, 504 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flanagan, J. L., J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 34, 1370 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mundie, J. R., in Middle Ear Function Seminar (edit. by Fletcher, J. L.) (US Army Medical Research Laboratory, Fort Knox, Report 576, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zwislocki, J., J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 35, 1034 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khanna, S. M., and Tonndorf, J., Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohr. Nas. Kehlk. Heilk., 193, 78 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MANLEY, G., IRVINE, D. & JOHNSTONE, B. Frequency Response of Bat Tympanic Membrane. Nature 237, 112–113 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237112a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/237112a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing