Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Explanation of Transient Lunar Phenomena based on Lunar Samples Studies

Abstract

VARIOUS authors1–4 have shown that transient lunar phenomena (TLPs) are unlikely to arise from the excitation of luminescence in lunar rocks by such agents as the solar wind5, but the luminescent efficiency is many orders of magnitude too low for this emission to be detected even by “line fill” techniques6. To see an effect against the normal moonlight a contrast brightness change of at least 10% is necessary representing an incremental light flux from the surface of the order of 10−2 W cm−2. The most likely cause of such a change is a change in the albedo. The low albedo of about 7% is a factor of 2 or 3 times lower than that of a terrestrial basaltic dust of similar composition. This is because of the “fairy castle” structure of the lunar dust, giving deep intergrain penetration of sunlight and little return except in the incidence direction. If this structure could be destroyed by breaking of the intergrain cohesion, then the albedo would rise. This could be achieved if the dust was “fluidized”. Such a process has already been associated with TLPs by Mills7 but he assumes that the TLP is seen because of the light emission caused by electrical discharges in the venting gases between grains. But the efficiency of excitation of such discharges will be rather low and the same kind of estimate as that made by Nash et al.3 for the luminescence of lunar dust will apply.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moore, P., J. Brit. Astron. Assoc., 81, 365 (1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Geake, J. E., Dollfus, A., Garlick, G. F. J., Lamb, W. E., Walker, G., Steigmann, G. A., and Titulaer, C., Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., 2127 (Pergamon, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nash, D. B., and Greer, R. T., Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., 2341 (Pergamon, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blair, I. M., and Edgington, J. A., Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., 2001 (Pergamon, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kopal, Z., and Rackham, T., Icarus, 2, 481 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grainger, J. F., and Ring, J., Proc. Intern. Space Sci. Symp., 989 (1963).

  7. Mills, A. A., Nature, 225, 929 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GARLICK, G., STEIGMANN, G. & LAMB, W. Explanation of Transient Lunar Phenomena based on Lunar Samples Studies. Nature 235, 39–40 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/235039a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/235039a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing