Abstract
DATA from the OSO-3 high energy gamma ray experiment have indicated an apparent isotropic background flux of gamma rays with energies greater than 100 MeV (ref. 1). The intensity of this flux has been found to be less than or equal to (1.1 ± 0.2) × 10−4 cm−2 s−1 sr−1. Clark et al.1 have pointed out that this flux may be compatible with an extrapolation of the observed X-ray spectrum below 1 MeV if the isotropic X-rays continue to follow a power-law spectral form. The explanation most usually considered for this power-law spectrum is that the X-rays may be generated by the interaction of metagalactic cosmic ray electrons with the universal thermal radiation2,3. (While the OSO-3 data are compatible with an extrapolation of the X-ray spectrum, they may indicate a gamma ray flux greater than this extrapolation. Above 100 keV, the differential X-ray spectrum is of the form4, I(Eγ) ≅ 1.5 × 10−2, Eγ−2.3 cm−2 MeV−1 s−1 sr−1 with Eγ in MeV. Such a power law would predict an integral flux above 100 MeV of 2.9 × 10−5 cm−2 s−1 sr−1, a factor of 4 below the OSO-3 value.)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, G. W., Garmire, G. P., and Kraushaar, W. L., Astrophys. J. Lett., 153, L203 (1968).
Felton, J. E., and Morrison, P., Astrophys. J., 146, 686 (1966).
Fazio, G. G., Stecker, F. W., and Wright, J. P., Astrophys. J., 144, 611 (1966).
Metzger, A. E., Anderson, E. C., van Dilla, M. A., and Arnold, J. R., Nature, 204, 766 (1964).
Stecker, E. W., Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Special Report No 260 (1967); see also Fazio, G. G., Helmkin, H. F., Cavrak, S. J., and Hearn, D. R., Canad. J. Phys., 46, S427 (1968).
Stecker, F. W., Tsuruta, S., and Fazio, G. G., Astrophys. J., 151, 881 (1968).
Conway, R. G., Kellerman, K. I., and Long, R. J., Mon. Not. Roy. Astro. Soc., 125, 261 (1963).
Sandage, A., Astrophys. J., 134, 916 (1961).
Henry, R. C., Fritz, G., Meekins, J. F., Friedman, H., and Byram, E. T., Astrophys. J. Lett., 153, L11 (1968).
Longair, M. S., Mon. Not. Roy. Astro. Soc., 133, 421 (1966).
Fazio, G. G., Ann. Rev. Astro. and Astrophys., 5, 481 (1967).
Cheng, C. C., Nature, 215, 1035 (1967).
Brecher, K., and Morrison, P., Astrophys. J. Lett., 150, L61 (1967).
Silk, J., Astrophys. J. Lett., 151, L19 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
STECKER, F. Isotropic Gamma Radiation and the Metagalactic Cosmic Ray Intensity. Nature 220, 675–676 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/220675a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/220675a0
This article is cited by
-
Predicted High Energy Break in the Isotropic Gamma Ray Spectrum: a Test of Cosmological Origin
Nature (1970)
-
Predictions of Extragalactic Gamma Ray Fluxes between 1 and 100 MeV
Nature (1969)
-
Cosmic Gamma Rays from Metagalactic Proton–Antiproton Annihilation
Nature (1969)
-
Corrections to Two Previous Articles on Extragalactic Gamma Rays and Implications of the Corrected Results
Nature (1969)
-
Origin of Galactic Gamma-rays
Nature (1969)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.