Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Numerical Homology

Abstract

THERE have recently been many objections to the orthodox definitions of biological homology in terms of common ancestry on the grounds that such definitions are circular1–4. Parts of two organisms are defined as homologous if they are represented by a single part in a common ancestor. But homology itself is invoked in making this identification of parts of organisms with a part in a common ancestor. Various authors have advocated a return to Owen's5 criterion of homology—“the correspondency of a part or organ, determined by its relative position and connexions, with a part or organ in a different animal”. Jardine6 has formulated a logical model for correspondence of parts of things with respect to a set of relations along lines suggested by Woodger3, and from it has derived a general method for finding such correspondences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyden, A., Quart. Rev. Biol., 18, 228 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyden, A., Amer. Midl. Nat., 37, 648 (1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodger, J. H., in Essays on Growth and Form (edit. by Le Gros Clark. W. E., and Medawar, P. B.) 95 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zangerl, R., Evolution, 2, 351 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Owen, R., Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 16, 169 (1847).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jardine, N., Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 18, 125 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allis, E. P., J. Morph., 12, 487 (1897).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Allis, E. P., J. Morph., 14, 425 (1898).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Allis, E. P., Anat. Anz., 18, 25 (1899).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodrich, E. S., in A Treatise on Zoology (edit. by Lankester, E. R.), part 9, fasc. 1 (Black, London, 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory, W. K., Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., N.S. 23, 75 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R., Principles of Numerical Taxonomu (Freeman, London and San Francisco, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ridewood, W. G., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1904 2, 448 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JARDINE, N., JARDINE, C. Numerical Homology. Nature 216, 301–302 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/216301a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/216301a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing