Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Metabolic Differences between Starch and Sucrose

Abstract

SINCE 1957, papers from this department have stressed that the dietary factor involved in the aetiology of ischaemic heart disease is likely to be sugar (sucrose) rather than fat1. The evidence incriminating dietary sugar—now quite strong—is chiefly epidemiological. Investigations of populations show that the rise in the incidence of the disease coincides with the rise in the consumption of sugar and not of fat2–4. Again, during investigations of individuals we have shown that the disease is most likely to occur in those that have been eating a great deal of sugar5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yudkin, J., Lancet, ii, 155 (1957). For summary, see Yudkin, J., Lancet, i, 1335 (1963).

  2. Cohen, A. M., Bavly, S., and Poznanski, R., Lancet, ii, 1399 (1961).

  3. Antar, M. A., Ohlson, M. A., and Hodges, R. E., Amer. J. Chin. Nutr., 14, 169 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yudkin, J., Lancet, ii, 4 (1964); Proc. Nutr. Soc., 23, 149 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yudkin, J., and Roddy, J., Lancet, ii, 6 (1964).

  6. Kinsell, L. D., Food Processing, 26, 67 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macdonald, I., Proc. Nutr. Soc., 23, 119 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Antar, M. A., and Ohlson, M. A., J. Nutrition, 85, 329 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, A. M., and Teitelbaum, A., Amer. J. Physiol., 206, 105 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomasson, H. J., Gottenbos, J. J., Kloeze, J., and Vles, R. O., Proc. Nutr. Soc. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AL-NAGDY, S., MILLER, D., QURESHI, R. et al. Metabolic Differences between Starch and Sucrose. Nature 209, 81–82 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/209081a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/209081a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing