Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Variation of Partition Coefficient

Abstract

MATSUI and I have estimated partition coefficients for some elements1–4 and discussed the significance5,6 of estimating them. More recently7, I have estimated partition coefficients for rubidium and strontium. However, we have little knowledge about what conditions affect partition coefficients and to what extent they can be influenced. For example, it is conceivable that temperature and pressure have some effects on them. But results so far obtained suggest that the effects of temperature and pressure are not serious. A difficult problem, however, is the influence of calcium. If magnesium and/or ferrous iron are the overwhelmingly predominant metallic cations in a liquid and a solid separated from it, the relationship between the chemical ‘environment’ and the partition coefficient is very simple. But if calcium is abundantly present its effect is superimposed on that of magnesium. The lower limit of concentration required for the appearance of this calcium effect is, as yet, unknown. However, since the effect is thought to arise when calcium becomes one of the host elements of rock-forming minerals, it is most probable that it occurs when the concentration of calcium in the ‘liquid’ (magma) is enriched to some definite degree. Furthermore, the combined or concurrent effect of calcium and magnesium may reflect the simple atomic ratio in which they are present in crystals. (These possibilities suggest that the apparent change of partition coefficient due to calcium is somewhat discrete.)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masuda, A., Nature, 203, 1161 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Masuda, A., INSJ–65, Inst. Nucl. Study, Univ. Tokyo (1964).

  3. Masuda, A., and Matsui, Y., INSJ–53, Inst. Nucl. Study, Univ. Tokyo (1963).

  4. Masuda, A., and Matsui, Y., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta (to be published).

  5. Masuda, A., Nature, 204, 373 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Masuda, A., Nature, 204, 567 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Masuda, A., Nature, 205, 555 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Masuda, A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta (to be published).

  9. Masuda, A., Nature, 205, 971 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitt, R. A., Smith, R. H., Lasch, J. E., Mosen, A. W., Olehy, D. A., and Vasilevskis, J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 27, 577 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haskin, L., and Gehl, M. A., J. Geophys. Res., 67, 2437 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MASUDA, A. Variation of Partition Coefficient. Nature 205, 1098–1099 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/2051098a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2051098a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing