Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

CONSERVATION OF HUMUS IN TROPICAL SOILS

Abstract

THE part played by humic manures in soil processes and in plant nutrition, both as a source of mineral elements and by improving the physical condition of the soil, is well known. The advantages of properly devised rotational systems of cropping in soil husbandry are also established by both practice and experience. It is therefore reasonable to expect results of great economic importance by a combination of rotational cropping with humic manuring. The permanent manurial small plots at the Institute of Plant Industry, Indore, afforded an opportunity of studying the relative importance of humic manures and crop rotation on the conservation of soil properties. These plots, sixteen in number, have, since 1933, been receiving annual surface dressings of farm compoat, farmyard manure and municipal compost, all at ten tons per acre, and have been under a four-year rotational cropping with (i) cotton, (ii) sann (Orotalaria juncea), ploughed in and followed by wheat, (iii) ground nut, and (iv) jowar (Andropogon sorghum) ; one set of four plots (including a control immanured plot) being under a particular crop during a season. The plots treated with the different humic manures, while yielding more or less alike from year to year with all the crops, had frequently given more than double the yields of the untreated plots.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tamhane, V. A., and Sreenivasan, A., Curr. Sci., 12, 135 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Russell, E. J., and Watson, D. J., Imp. Bureau of Soil Sci., Tech. Commn., 40, 50 (1940).

  3. Russell, E. J., and Voelcker, J. A., "Fifty Years of Field Experiments at the Woburn Experimental Station" (London: Longmans, 1936), 322.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dhar, N. R., and Mukerji, S. K., NATURE, 138, 1060 (1936).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dhar, N. R., NATURE, 151, 590 (1943).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Russell, J. C., J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 19, 380 (1927).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenny, H., J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 20, 900 (1928); Soil Sci., 29, 193(1930).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahasrabuddhe, D. L., Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci., India, 3, 139 (1937).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohr, E. C. J., cited from S. A. Waksman's "Humus" (London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox, 1938), 2nd edit., 258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SREENIVASAN, A. CONSERVATION OF HUMUS IN TROPICAL SOILS. Nature 152, 572–573 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1038/152572a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/152572a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing