Abstract
MAY I be allowed a short space in reply to Prof. Hull's courteous reference to my letter on the Charnwood rocks, for I fear that I have failed to make two points in that sufficiently clear? One was, that as the Borrowdale series of the Lake District and the (Lower) Cambrian series of North Wales are equally azoic, no correspondence in time with the latter could be inferred for the azoic Charnwood rocks. The argument from absence of fossils surely tells as much one way as the other; indeed, having regard to the similar petrological conditions of the Borrowdale and Charnwood rocks, I think it is slightly in favour of their correspondence. The other point was, that as Prof. Sedgwick's term Cambrian included the Cambrian and Lower Silurian of the survey, his authority could not be quoted in favour of the (Lower) Cambrian age of the Charnwood rocks any more than of their correspondence with the Borrowdale series, unless it could be shown (I am not aware that it can) that he had definitely correlated them with (Lower) Cambrian beds.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BONNEY, T. The Rocks of Charnwood Forest. Nature 15, 137–138 (1876). https://doi.org/10.1038/015137b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/015137b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.