Abstract
IN 1926, Prof. E. W. Brown1 raised the question whether the usual equation, is rigorously true for a radiating star and, in a letter to NATURE, Sir Joseph Larmor has advanced, from considerations of momentum, that (1) is true.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Larmor, Sir Joseph, "Coll. Papers", 2, 672 (1929), or NATURE, 117, 300 (Feb. 27, 1926). See also "Astronomy and Cosmogony" by Sir James Jeans, 298 (1929).
Narlikar, V. V., NATURE, 141, 906 (May 21, 1938).
Eddington, Sir A. S., "The Mathematical Theory of Relativity", 127 (1924). The interpretation of (5) is not, however, mentioned in Eddington's book.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
NARLIKAR, V. Relativistic Motion of a Radiating Mass. Nature 142, 717–718 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/142717b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/142717b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
