| |
Biodiversity may be a buzzword, but as a concept
it sits at the heart of ecological research. Some ecological communities, such
as pristine coral reef systems, are astonishingly rich in the number and types
of species that they support, whereas others are relatively species poor. Natural
communities also differ greatly in the proportion of species performing different
ecological functions. What determines such differences and how these differences
are related to ecosystem functioning are questions that have occupied the minds
of ecologists for decades. But these questions are so much more pressing
now. We live at a time of rapid environmental change, resulting largely from our
own activities, and a concomitant, accelerating rate of habitat loss and species
extinctions. Like children playing with fire, we do not fully understand, and
therefore cannot predict, the ultimate consequences of tampering with global biodiversity.
This collection of reviews the second in our new section called 'Nature
Insight' focuses on the science of biodiversity. We are pleased to acknowledge the financial support of the Center for Applied Biodiversity Science (CABS), a division of Conservation International, in producing this Insight. The content is in accord with the philosophy that biodiversity conservation is a human-centred pursuit that must be underpinned by solid science. Of course, Nature carries sole responsibility for all editorial content and rigorous peer-review. This Insight is deliberately
broad in scope, covering underlying concepts, pure and applied research, and biodiversity
loss from the human perspective. We hope that scientists, policy-makers and general
readers alike will find the reviews both informative and thought provoking. Rory
Howlett Deputy Biological Sciences Editor
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||