TRIASSIC DINOSAURIA
IT will probably interest geologists and palaeontologists
to know that a recent examination of the numerous remains of Thecodontosauria in the
Brisol Museum, enables me to demonstrate that these Triassic reptiles belong to the order
Dinosauria, and are closely allied to Megalosaurus. The vertebrae, humerus, and ilium,
found in the Warwickshire Trias, which have been ascribed to Labyrinthodon, also belong to
Dinosauria. The two skeletons obtained in the German Trias near Stuttgart, and described
by Prof. Plieninyer, Some years ago, are also unquestionable Dinosauria; and, as Von
Meyer is of opinion, probably belong to the genus Teratosaurus, from the same beds. Von
Meyer's Plataeosaurus, from the German Trias, is, plainly, as he has indicated it to be, a
Dinosaurian.
As Prof. Cope has suggested, it is very
probable that Bathygnathus, from the Triassic beds of Prince Edward's Island, is a
Dinosaurian; and I have no hesitation in expressing the belief, that the Deuterosaurus,
from the Ural, which occurs in beds which are called Permian, but which appear to be
Triassic, is also a Dinosaurian. It is also very probable that Rhopalodon, which occurs in
these rocks, belongs to the same order. If so, the close resemblance of the South African
Galesaurus to Rhopalodon, would lead me to expect the former to prove a Dinosaur.
I have found an indubitable fragment of
a Dinosaurian among some fossils, not long ago sent to me, from the reptiliferous beds of
Central India, by Dr. Oldham, the Director of the Indian Geological Survey. Further, the
determination of the Thecodonts as Dinosauria, leaves hardly any doubt that the little
Ankistrodon from these Indian rocks, long since described by me, belongs to the same
group.
But another discovery in the same batch
of fossils from India, leaves no question on my mind that the Fauna of the beds which
yield Labyrinthodonts and Dicynodonts in that country, represents the terrestrial Fauna of
the Trias of Europe. I find, in fact, numerous fragments of the crocodilian reptile, so
closely allied to the Belodon of the German Trias, that the determination of the points of
difference requires close attention, associated with a Hypcrodapedon, larger than those
discovered in the Elgin Sandstones, but otherwise very similar to it.
Thus, during the Triassic epoch,
extensive dry land seems to have existed in North America, Western and Central Europe,
Eastern Europe, Central India, and South Africa, as it does now; and, throughout this vast
area, the Dinosauria -- the links between reptiles and birds -- seem to have been represented by
not fewer, probably by many more, than nine or ten distinct genera.
I hope, shortly, to have the honour of
placing the details of the researches into the structure and distribution of the
Dinosauria, in which I have been engaged for the last two years, and of which the above
notice is one of the results, before the Geological Society.
T. H. HUXLEY