Original Article

Molecular Therapy (2005) 12, 716–724; doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.03.031

Alteration of splicing signals in a genomic/cDNA hybrid VEGF gene to modify the ratio of expressed VEGF isoforms enhances safety of angiogenic gene therapy

Hideki Amano1, Neil R. Hackett2, Robert J. Kaner3, Paul Whitlock1, Todd K. Rosengart4 and Ronald G. Crystal1,2,3

  1. 1Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 515 East 71st Street, S-1000, New York, NY 10021, USA
  2. 2Belfer Gene Therapy Core Facility, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
  3. 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA
  4. 4Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Evanston Healthcare System, Evanston, IL, USA

Correspondence: Ronald G. Crystal, Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 515 East 71st Street, S-1000, New York, NY 10021, USA. Fax: +1 212 746 8383. E-mail: geneticmedicine@med.cornell.edu

Received 17 May 2004; Revised 3 January 2005; Accepted 11 March 2005.

Top

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated physiological angiogenesis results from the concerted action of three major VEGF isoforms (VEGF121, 165, 189), which arise from alternate splicing. We have previously shown that expression of a mixture of VEGF isoforms via gene transfer is considerably more potent than expression of a single VEGF isoform. To test the hypothesis that different mixtures of VEGF isoforms may offer the same therapeutic benefit with a better safety profile, we compared the efficacy and safety of an adenovirus gene transfer vector expressing the three major VEGF isoforms (AdVEGF-All) in the normal ratio to those of AdVEGF-All6A+, in which the splicing sequences for exon 6A were altered to promote expression of VEGF189 at the expense of VEGF121. Both vectors were equally potent in mediating recovery of hind-limb blood flow following experimental ischemia. By contrast, intravenous administration of AdVEGF-All6A+ yielded enhanced survival and a lower capacity to support tumor growth compared to AdVEGF-All, and intratracheal administration of AdVEGF-All6A+ resulted in less pulmonary edema than that of AdVEGF-All. We conclude that AdVEGF-All and AdVEGF-All6A+ are similar in potency but that AdVEGF-All6A+ is safer. This suggests that AdVEGF-All6A+ may be the preferred candidate for clinical development.

Keywords:

angiogenesis, gene therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor, safety, adenovirus

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT