TABLE 1
FROM:
Probiotic modulation of symbiotic gut microbial–host metabolic interactions in a humanized microbiome mouse model
Francois-Pierre J Martin, Yulan Wang, Norbert Sprenger, Ivan K S Yap, Torbjörn Lundstedt, Per Lek, Serge Rezzi, Ziad Ramadan, Peter van Bladeren, Laurent B Fay, Sunil Kochhar, John C Lindon, Elaine Holmes & Jeremy K Nicholson
doi:10.1038/msb4100190
BACK TO ARTICLETable 1: Microbial species counts in mouse feces at the end of the experiment
| Groups/log10 CFU | HBF (n=10) | HBF+L. paracasei (n=9) | HBF+L. rhamnosus (n=9) |
|---|---|---|---|
log10 CFU (colony-forming unit) given per gram of wet weight of feces. Data are presented as mean | |||
| L. paracasei | — | 8.5 0.2 | — |
| L. rhamnosus | — | — | 7.8 0.2 |
| E. coli | 9.2 0.3 | 9.4 0.3 | 9.8 0.5** |
| B. breve | 9.1 0.2 | 7.78 2.13 | 8.7 0.3* |
| B. longum | 8.2 0.6 | 5.6 1.9*** | 6.3 0.5*** |
| S. aureus | 7.4 0.3 | 6.3 0.3*** | 6.6 0.5*** |
| S. epidermidis | 4.8 0.4 | 4.9 1.2 | 4.0 0.5** |
| C. perfringens | 7.2 0.3 | 7.0 0.5 | 5.7 1.0*** |
| Bacteroides | 10.3 0.2 | 10.4 0.2 | 10.1 0.4 |

s.d. Absence of specific bacterial strains in the gut microflora is indicated by "—". The values for the HBF mice supplemented with probiotics were compared to HBF control mice, *,** and *** indicate a significant difference at 95, 99 and 99.9% confidence levels, respectively.